Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
No doubt is that the world is changed recently, due to myriad advancement in all the life field. And on from these changes is the role of the parents in their children`s education. Some people think that their roles are not change. On the other hand, some of them say that their become more involved in their children education. From my point of view I agree with the second school, and I believe that the changes is mandatory and essential part in this modern life. However, my view will be analyzed in this essay for further explanation.
To begin with, it is no exaggeration to say that nowadays, due to the evolution in all the world field, a lot of roles changes. And one from these changes is the parents roles toward their children`s education. On the one hand, let us think about what the technology bring to us and it is effect on the pupils, and there is a scientific statistic indicate that the pupils studying hours decrease a lot from the past, so it is normal that the parents roles changes from the past. However, the vivid example is my youngest brother because of presence the social media such as Facebook, Snap chat and other Websites, he takes a special care and different way of dealing from my parents and actually it is differed from me or my oldest brother.
On the other hand, the family members number in the past were huge. There were extended families and there was no time with the parents to gave their children enough time to educate them like now. For instance, my both grand parents families consist of fifteen daughters and sons. So the first goal for the parents is looking to feed them. In contrast, the all the families nowadays are nuclear families that is mean fewer members not like the previous one. For example, my family consist of four members so the amount of caring in our education will be easier simply because there is time with my parents.
All in all, I think my opinion is strong and solid enough to clarify all the previous reasons beyond my agreement, and i believe the changes was mandatory we cannot stand in one spot while the world in fast race.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | aymenhamrouni | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | hesam_75 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | kangyan | 90 | view |
| 2019-12-20 | fafar | 90 | view |
- tpo 27 81
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 66
- Nowadays we live in very complex modern life. So, we have to do many and different task to fill our days in fruitful tasks. in spits of, others prefer doing one task in all their day long. And in my point of view doing many tasks is very important to live 60
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 66
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 120, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...evious reasons beyond my agreement, and i believe the changes was mandatory we ca...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, if, look, second, so, while, for example, for instance, i think, in contrast, no doubt, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58684210526 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41368874377 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478947368421 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 539.1 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.9248044411 48.9658058833 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.529411765 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3529411765 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.11764705882 5.45110844103 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194869150588 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726898653504 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633699801347 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109748495816 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542212670093 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.