Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
Nowadays, the consumption of petroleum has increased and then it caused two main serious problems that we are struggling to sort out. Some argue that the increased cost of gas is the best approach to solve these problems. However, I think that I partly agree with this statement and therefore I will suggest other solutions.
To start with, it is true that a rising price of oil can diminish in part the air pollution and traffic jam because many might not be able to afford that. They would be likely to try to save the energy and use the public transit instead of their private cars. As a result, fewer private vehicles would make less traffic jam and also cut down the emission of methane from commuting or traveling which will improve the air quality. On the contrast, going up the coast of petrol will threaten people's livelihood such as truck driver or taxi driver.
What other modes can be replace? In my opinion, there are two alternative solutions to settle this issue. Firstly, government should develop the alternative energy instead of fuel energy such as solar power, wind power and hydropower in order to be utilized in vehicles and factories. These substitutive resources will help to decrease harmful effects of air which are Co2 and methane. Secondly, the public transportation should be improved. If this system is doing well without using private vehicles, people will be willing to use the public transit to commute or go on a trip. Because of these reasons, that is why I believe.
To put in a nutshell, rising the cost of petrol is not effective way to resolve growing traffic and pollution problems. But there are alternative methods to sort out these troubles which are to develop substituted energy and the public transit.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-02 | happyhappy | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | julieehung | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | Chi Hoang | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | Chi Hoang | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | ghikar | 78 | view |
- Currently, there is a trend toward the use of alternative forms of medicine. However, at best these methods are ineffective, and the worst they may be dangerous.To what extent do you agree with this statement? 67
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programs(for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to young children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- In general, people do not have such a close relationship with their neighbours as they did in the past. Why this so, and what can be done to improve contact between neighbours? 78
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 117, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun might seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much might', 'a good deal of might'.
Suggestion: much might; a good deal of might
...e air pollution and traffic jam because many might not be able to afford that. They would ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, i think, such as, as a result, in my opinion, it is true, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83666666667 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56314693731 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8250363594 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6875 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194536584034 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603872720668 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658278918724 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115202473982 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249726136558 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.