Cheap overseas travel does more damage than good
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement. Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience.
Write between 200-300 words.
Nowadays, one of the conspicuous trends of today’s world is the affordable travelling options in terms of flight tickets, accommodations and other resources which are available for us. There is widespread worry that it would only lead to myriad of concerns to the people who avail such cheap options. However, I am inclined to believe that this apprehension is unwarranted and so should be rejected.
To begin with, there are deluge of arguments in favor of my stance but the most preponderant one is that, inexpensive travel gave a boom to tourism industry and created a lot of jobs and opportunities. Few decades ago, travelling overseas was not possible for a common man and most of the people could only dreamed of visiting exotic places but with the evolution of tourism industry, low priced travel made it quite easy for anyone to purse his/her dreams and to explore the immense beauty of the world. Therefore, needless to say, all these merits have a far reaching positive impact on our world.
Secondly, another pivotal aspect of this argument is that, budget travel opened new doors for students, philosophers, writers, artists who wanted to travel, experience and exchange different cultures by travelling. Furthermore, businessmen also took benefit of reasonable travel options and used it in an effective way to communicate and to crack deals with their international customers. Hence, it is apparent that why many are in favor of the economical travel.
To recapitulate, the forgoing discussion propounds the view that the benefits of cheap travel are indeed too great to ignore but both states and folks have to be responsible while travelling abroad.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-03 | hemsingh81 | 77 | view |
| 2019-06-21 | harshmehta.hm | 77 | view |
| 2019-06-03 | dineshshinde98 | 22 | view |
| 2019-04-20 | mohab.elhaddad | 77 | view |
| 2019-02-12 | ghimirra | 55 | view |
- Mandatory electoral voting systems function better than free choice voting systems Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement Support your point of views with reasons and examples 94
- Some people suggest that each family should only have one car and encourage alternative vehicle. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are role models for youngsters. Do you agree with this statement? 77
- Some people think the purpose of education is to prepare the future workforce and make good members of society Others think the purpose of education should lead to self fulfillment What is your opinion 71
- Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products?" Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 26, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'deluges'?
Suggestion: deluges
...e rejected. To begin with, there are deluge of arguments in favor of my stance but ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: GAVE_GIVE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'give'?
Suggestion: give
...nderant one is that, inexpensive travel gave a boom to tourism industry and created ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 300, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective way" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...f reasonable travel options and used it in an effective way to communicate and to crack deals with ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18382352941 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91499375322 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654411764706 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.7080205073 50.4703680194 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.0 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.7 7.25397266985 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132213941836 0.242375264174 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0463147049233 0.0925447433944 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0251492137596 0.071462118173 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0758923045976 0.151781067708 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0158300349568 0.0609392437508 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.1260098522 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.