An increasing number of advertisement on Tv aim at children. What are the effects of television advertising? Should television advertising be controlled?
It is argued that there are numerous adverts on television with the aim of children as a way to raise their number of sales. This phenomenon exerts some detrimental effects on both children and their parents, and I am of the opinion that some measures should be put forward to tackle it.
When children become the main customers who companies gear toward, they and their parent will be burdened some unwanted outcomes. First and foremost, children will be swayed by advertisements to insist on their parents to buy products impulsively. While young customers are frequently not fully equipped with abilities to differentiate between good products or not. Therefore, their parents would purchase products reluctantly following their children’s hobbies and interest to satisfy their children’s demand. This will lead to a reduction in their own budget. Another detrimental influence is that when there have too many adverts on television, children’s cognitive development will suffer from. This is because they would believe in all information on that adverts.
This trend makes me believe that some strict regulations should be imposed by government’s bodies. The explanation for this is that when the government enacts laws on companies, this will raise their awareness about the role of exact information conveyed on television. If they do not supply exact and enough information about their products, they will be punished. Consequently, not only children but also their parents will gain positive effects. Parents could save money instead purchasing products for their children without intention.
To conclude, numerous adverts on television are exerting detrimental effects on not only children but also their parents and I would contend that government should enact some strict laws to tackle this trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | quyduongk30ctn | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | Ha Ngoc Hong Gam | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | Linh Hoang | 89 | view |
| 2018-01-29 | o0olynero0o | 61 | view |
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015. 67
- Some people think that schools should reward students who show the best academic results, while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvements. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- Whether or not someone achievies their aims is mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- As major cities in the world are growing today so do their problems What are problems for young people who are living in the cities as the result of continued growth How problems might be solved 58
- Nowadays, not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries. What are the reasons for this problem? What are the effects on the society? 63
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, so, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55160142349 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99242763796 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544483985765 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3058308437 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73333333333 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144335909514 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545113980935 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561891637966 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108591123854 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462302461184 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.