Xenophobia has accelerated rapidly in the Western counties. According to you what solutions can be proposed by the government and individuals?
Recently, the phenomenon of the xenophobia in the Western countries and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the number of depressions is highly rewarding, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by substantial of individuals. I am inclined to believe that strong fears can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, fears of strangers can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that public, as well as language barriers, are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the various culture. Thus, beneficial ramifications of the social and racial discrimination apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of the strangers, the interacting with strangers might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of the mental problems. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of the foreign migrants relate to this reality that demerits of the violence, pertain to crime. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of a new culture is correlated negatively with nationalism. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the different behavior.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of relationships with foreigners far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of xenophobic attack prove the significance of the racist, but also pinpoint culture shock implications.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-25 | richierich25 | 88 | view |
2019-10-10 | Roshanip | 55 | view |
2019-10-04 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
2019-09-17 | maniram vicky | 75 | view |
2019-07-26 | Daniel Torres | 77 | view |
- People pursue dangerous activities like skydiving, motorcycle sports, whitewater river rafting etc. Do you support? If yes, why and if not, why? 11
- Parents are responsible for the behavior of the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 88
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing, skydiving, bungee jumping or not? What are the reasons for that? 88
- Parents are responsible for the behavior of their children.To what extend do you agree or disagree. 85
- Xenophobia has accelerated rapidly in the Western countries. According to you what solutions can be proposed by the government and individuals? 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67716535433 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28154743027 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657480314961 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3155293643 50.4703680194 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.166666667 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0838936656843 0.242375264174 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0273221649221 0.0925447433944 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368733708899 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0437025223612 0.151781067708 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440057721507 0.0609392437508 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.02 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.