The means of communication have changed a lot in people’s daily life. What are the positive and negative impact of this?
Information technology has brought the world closer together and made it a global village. Now, we can not only share an information quickly and efficiently, but we can also bring down barriers of linguistic and geographic boundaries. This essay will discuss pros and cons of mass communication on individual lives before delivering conclusion.
To begin, technology has drastically changed the way of mass communication. Now, with the help of smartphones, we can communicate with anyone around the globe by simply sending a text message or sending them an email. In addition, we can do face-to-face communication with our kin and kith with the help of video conferencing. For instance, skype, the computer application helps us to do video conferencing with the help of internet. Also, students can take online coaching regarding their subjects by sitting at home. This eventually could save their travelling time.
On the other hand, some people believe that an information revolution has decreased the privacy of individuals. From cell phone’s signals to email hacking, people are worried about their private information, which could be stolen and misused. Furthermore, traditional culture of many countries is now changing. To exemplify, youngsters in Third World countries who watch Hollywood movies try to copy lifestyle of people of developed countries, hence, they stop giving respect to their culture. Lastly, as information on the internet is in English language, many other languages are losing their importance.
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that, mass communication has tremendous benefits for all of us. But, we should keep in our mind that every garden has some weeds, so government should create some laws to handle negative side of mass communication.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-02-27 | Tamanna_87 | 77 | view |
- Is it a foolish idea to get married and settle down before finishing your studies? To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are role models for youngsters. Give your opinion on this matter. 55
- Do you think English will remain to be a global language despite globalization? 77
- Some people work hard for long hours to achieve success and some give importance for free time for themselves. Give your opinion and discuss your views. 80
- Is television (primarily) a form of entertainment or information? 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, lastly, regarding, so, third, for instance, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45487364621 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11342906624 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660649819495 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.0718913883 50.4703680194 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4375 104.977214359 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3125 20.9669160288 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0924500492619 0.242375264174 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0286709568874 0.0925447433944 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0260405364479 0.071462118173 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0500984801609 0.151781067708 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00734763741713 0.0609392437508 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.