People now are better at protecting the environment than people in the past.
People often process different perspectives about whether people now are better at protecting the environment that people in the past. Based on my personal experience and observation of the life. I strongly agree that people now are better at protecting the environment.
First of all, nowadays people care much about the future, and protecting the environment can ensure people have enough natural resource to use in the future. For example, today almost everyone knows that the natural resource, like fossil oil, is limited. In fact, people use fossil oil every day in many aspects, such as using fossil oil to be the energy for cars or material for plastic products. As a result, people come up with some environmental protection policies to prevent from overusing fossil oil. By doing so, people can ensure they will have fossil oil to use for more than thirty years.
Secondly, today people put more emphasis on the health and protecting the environment can help people to be healthier. For example, the severe air pollution in China gave people' health extremely negative effect from twenty years ago. In fact, the Chinese government established the strict rule to forbid the factories from producing toxic pollution gas three years ago. (2)After the rule announced, the research found that people' health conditions got the improvement because the air pollution was not as serious as in the past. (3) Actually, people did not think about how air pollution would affect their health twenty years ago. Hence, they did not take any action to control the air pollution at that time.
Last but not least, people now are concerned about the quality of life, and protecting the environment can provide people with the good quality of life. For example, people usually enjoy getting close to the nature on weekends. (1) Actually, getting close to nature can help people release the stress in their daily life. Taiwanese government set up eight national parks to protect the environment, the environment in the park is well-protected, and the parks are free to open to all citizens. As a result, people can enjoy the weekends by going to National parks.
In conclusion, I maintain that people now are better at protecting the environment than people in the past. After all, nowadays people really care much about the future, the health and the quality of life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-26 | rahul chauhan | 68 | view |
- Which way do you think is the best for a student to make new friends. a. joining a sports team, b. participate in community activities, c. traveling. 75
- TPO 43 83
- Should the government invest money to improve Internet access or public transportation? 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what field they study in. 60
- school used to offer three after-class activities.1)sports 2)art 3)volunteeringļ¼but this year, school's extra money may only can offer one activity. Which one do you choose and why? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, hence, if, really, second, secondly, so, well, after all, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 43.0788530466 30% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1974.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 391.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04859335038 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57719560627 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475703324808 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.9 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6346777203 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.619047619 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.19047619048 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.536679911108 0.236089414692 227% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.192533694144 0.076458572812 252% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.218562695615 0.0737576698707 296% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.389781329976 0.150856017488 258% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.197893279187 0.0645574589148 307% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.