Do you agree with getting married before finishing studies?
Recently, the phenomenon of getting married before finishing studies and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of early spousal relationship is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that getting married before graduation can be a plus, and I will analyze that through this essay.
From a social standpoint, early marriage can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that fulfilling the sexual needs, as well as maturity, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of early spousal before graduating. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both developing skills and sharing responsibility apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of studying expenditure, getting married before graduation might increase the consequences of disability of life management. Moreover, fundamental aspects of distraction would relate to this reality that the demerits of lack of concentration pertain to arduous tasks. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of disability of attention to children is correlated negatively with lack of time. Hence, it is correct to presume the perceived notion of life responsibility.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of getting married before studying far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of sharing ideas prove the significance of strong support, but also pinpoint the responsibility of couples as social implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-31 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-08-17 | Rafia Jawad | 88 | view |
| 2024-08-14 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-06-06 | Sridarani | 70 | view |
| 2024-05-24 | Sridarani | 69 | view |
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing, skydiving, bungee jumping or not? What are the reasons for that? 85
- If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which subject will you choose? 11
- For a successful company selling products depends more on company s reputation or it depends more on if they provide discount and free offers To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- study global warming as a subject of climate change 85
- Do you think English will remain a global language despite globalization? Discuss you views with examples. 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73992673993 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27636379262 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630036630037 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2008580474 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.583333333 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271184116357 0.242375264174 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859179929332 0.0925447433944 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0995787930322 0.071462118173 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147744164598 0.151781067708 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686100500911 0.0609392437508 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.