Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology is now replacing their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Computer technology has made information available at a click of a button. This phenomenon has led certain people to believe that maintaining public libraries is waste of valuable resources, as libraries have been replaced by online websites and discussion forums. Though, I do not agree with their view.
Students are greatly benefited by the relevant and detailed information available at their disposal. With the help of computers they no longer need to check in the library if the book is available and if not, what is the waiting period. Use of computers and internet saves precious time for the students. As the prime reason for libraries is no longer relevant in today’s age. It is correct on the part of certain people to say maintaining of public libraries is waste of money.
Whereas, information available on internet is not always accurate. As more and more individuals have access to sharing information, it has been observed that much of it is incorrect and without any proof to support. Moreover, computers and websites sharing information are always at the risk of a virus attack, which can wipe out all the data within a fraction of a second. Therefore, maintenance and updation of public libraries is essential as it can serve as a vital tool of information at any given time.
In my opinion, computers and internet are a valuable resource as it saves time and provides convenience. But maintaining public library is necessary as internet information at times can be incorrect and unavailable, unlike libraries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-04-15 | karankhanolkar | 67 | view |
| 2018-04-15 | karankhanolkar | 61 | view |
- Some People Think It Is Acceptable To Use Animals For The Benefit Of Humans. Other People Think It Is Wrong To Exploit Animals For Human Purposes. What Is Your Opinion? 73
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology is now replacing their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 61
- Science tells us the activites which are good for our health and which are bad. Millions of people all over the world know this and still do unhealthy acitvites. Why do think this is and what can be done to change this. 78
- Fewer and fewer young people are choosing to become teachers Why do young people not want to be teachers How this could be changed 75
- Write a letter to an English-speaking friend. In your letter– explain why you changed jobs– describe your new job– tell him/her your other news 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 266, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... online websites and discussion forums. Though, I do not agree with their view. Stu...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... public libraries is waste of money. Whereas, information available on internet is n...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, whereas, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1293.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11067193676 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96836102582 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525691699605 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4257949577 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3571428571 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236102808193 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819125229752 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688629258622 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153973620586 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0908656552175 0.056905535591 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.