Recycling our waste is a big issue today. A lot of people feel that others are not recycling enough and that the government should make it a legal requirement. In your opinion, should laws be needed to ensure that people recycle their waste?
It is irrefutable to say, with the world moving toward cheaper and easy accessible objects, waste production has rocketed. Question is why people are not concerned about the deteriorating effect of the non-recycling waste, or they will only follow a track of recycling if the harsh rule is implied. In the following essay i will be discussing about the negative effects of non recycling and things a governing body can do to make it possible.
To begin with, it is always a better option to re use a thing than buying a new product. From saving a financial burden to a clean environment, there are only the positive aspect of recycling. One of the myriad positive aspects is, by recycling we are conserving nature, and there are many product that can be recycled which we lagging at. For instance, according to New York Times , by 2050 the number of plastics in the oceans will triple and will be causing detrimental effect on the marine life.
Moreover the detrimental effect can only be controlled if the strict laws against recycling are implemented. Plastic, for example are the significant cause of pollution in many countries, and colossal of metropolitan have used the rule to recycle most of the product , however the difficult situation prevails in the poorer nations. Any plan made in the path of conservation nature and reuse and recycle is smaller, so we have to make recycling aor ut most goal and move forward in the path of recycling.
To recapitulate, the most significant problem the world is facing is the recycling of the product and governing bodies, concerned authorities should treat this problem with utmost care as the next generation is in their hand and preserving , conserving and recycling is the only thing we can do to the preserve the world nature.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-29 | chinni2487 | 78 | view |
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of poorer nations to look after their citizen themselves? 61
- Environment pollution is too alarming to be manged by individuals . Real change can be made at the goverment level .What extent do you argee or disagree. 78
- Should the authorities from big cities around the world discourage citizens from using private cars and rather encourage them to use other means of transport such as bicycles, skates, the subway, etc.? 56
- As global trade increases between different countries , many daily necessities are produced in other countries. Such goods are usually transported to a long distance. Do the benefit of this trend outweigh its drawbacks? 77
- Nowadays people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life Discuss 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 323, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...rule is implied. In the following essay i will be discussing about the negative e...
^
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'aspects'?
Suggestion: aspects
...nvironment, there are only the positive aspect of recycling. One of the myriad positiv...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun product seems to be countable; consider using: 'many products'.
Suggestion: many products
...we are conserving nature, and there are many product that can be recycled which we lagging a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'products'?
Suggestion: products
...e conserving nature, and there are many product that can be recycled which we lagging a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...or instance, according to New York Times , by 2050 the number of plastics in the o...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...rimental effect on the marine life. Moreover the detrimental effect can only be cont...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 267, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... the rule to recycle most of the product , however the difficult situation prevail...
^^
Line 7, column 240, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...neration is in their hand and preserving , conserving and recycling is the only th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90099009901 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83167436034 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554455445545 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.3871297647 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.0 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5454545455 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236234446498 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863714666757 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598366681001 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144857812023 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410203385443 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.