The table shows the number of people in Canada in each earning level
The table compares the number of citizens in Canada in each income braket from 2005 to 2009. At first glance, it is evident that the number of people in highest income was the lowest throughout five years.
By 2005, the number of people in the lowest income was the highest, at around 10 million people and this figure decreased to approximately 7 million people in 2009. By contrast, the number of people earning over $150.000 reached just under 500.000 people in 2009, however which increased by nearly 200.000 people from 2005 to 2009.
The number of people earning between $20.000 and $50.000 was not significantly different over five years, with approximately 9 million people in 2005 and nearly 9.3 million people in 2009. The number of people in the next income level rose from 4.6 million people to just under 7 million people between 2005 and 2006, then which slightly increased to nearly 8 million people in 2009.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-25 | hien3112 | 67 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The flowchart illustrates the production of coloured plastic paper clips in a small factory.Write a report for a university tutor describing the production process 56
- the graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five-year period.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The bar chart shows the number of times per week in 1000s over 5 weeks that three computer packages were downloaded from the Internet 74
- The graph below gives information about international migration to the UK 1999 2008 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Make comparisons where relevant 67
- We have become a disposable society preferring to buy new products rather than repair existing items Why do you think this is How can this trend be reversed 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the highest'.
Suggestion: in the highest
...it is evident that the number of people in highest income was the lowest throughout five y...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 770.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87341772152 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33780025803 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 72.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455696202532 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 207.0 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1378812296 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.333333333 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319509336017 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187375797146 0.103423049105 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496477673709 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237410996258 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209111821411 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.63 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 17.0 40.7170731707 42% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.