Successful sport stars and glamorous film stars are role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not?
Undoubtedly, celebrities and sports person have a huge impact on youngsters’ life and considering them as a role model is widely debatable; innumerable people believe that these celebrities have hardly any useful purpose to serve.
It is being asserted by intellectuals that they may not be followed for umpteen reasons. Firstly, film stars and sports stars always remain far away from their family members. They never care about their social responsibilities, and they always denied performing social activities. Thus, if today’s youngsters will follow them, they will also live away from their parents. Furthermore, Younger persons do not follow them because they are in rush to earn name and fame. These celebrities have no academic knowledge; they are relatively unaware regarding mythologies are being used by experts to combat with serious issues.
Moreover, several academic studies show that these celebrities have indulged themselves in taking drugs. All the activities are performed by them after consuming drugs. These have adverse impact on their health. Therefore, it can be conceded that youngsters should never follow them. If these will become their role model, they will also indulge into such unethical practices.
At the end recapitulating the whole discussion, it is professed that these celebrities are being denied by youngsters; hence, they do not follow them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-17 | aminrad | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | NancySood | 72 | view |
| 2019-06-07 | Dilpreet singh | 72 | view |
| 2019-06-07 | Majheal Singh | 77 | view |
- Television shows and its impact on society 77
- Experience is the best teacher than traditional teaching methods. Agree/ Disagree 55
- What are mass communications? What are the means of mass communication and advantage and disadvantages of it? 72
- Should parents be hold legally responsible for the action of their children? 55
- Nowadays TV has become an essential part of life. Medium of spreading news and for some it acts like a companion. What is your opinion about this? 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ave hardly any useful purpose to serve. It is being asserted by intellectuals th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 20.9802955665 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 31.9359605911 63% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.75862068966 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1192.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 213.0 242.827586207 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59624413146 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92556454421 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 139.433497537 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62441314554 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 379.143842365 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.6157635468 217% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.2554433169 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6923076923 104.977214359 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3846153846 20.9669160288 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117749310674 0.242375264174 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420266179799 0.0925447433944 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067544114607 0.071462118173 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0706749795323 0.151781067708 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248680744381 0.0609392437508 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.1260098522 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.