Government should reduce their investments in arts, music and painting. Do you agree or disagree?
The recent phenomenon of government investment in traditional arts and music is widely debated with many people claiming that government should cut down these unnecessary expenditures and should spend more on vital sectors. However, I firmly believe that government and authorities should invest in preserving these traditional forms of arts, paintings and music as they give an identity to a country’s culture. This essay will further elaborate on both sides and thus, will lead to a reasoned conclusion.
At the outset, there are various persuasive arguments in favour of government expenditure in arts, music and paintings and the most conspicuous one is that these forms represent the cultural heritage of a country and reminiscences the local customs and beliefs of the people. Moreover, spending a proportional amount on preserving these traditions would contribute to the creativity of the people and would give them a chance to showcase their talents. Thus, this would offer a platform to younger ones who get inspired by the folk songs and contemporary arts and want to pursue their careers in them.
In contrast, people who argue otherwise balance their arguments on the gravity of the seriousness of the issues concerning the health, education, defence, law and the like of the economy. Admittedly, these sectors draw mammoths sums from government expenditure but still lacks when a country has a burgeoning population to handle. Moreover, investing in public sectors would make an economy stronger and would increase the development rate.
In views of the arguments mentioned above, one can conclude that despite government spends astronomical sums on various sectors including health and education, a proportional amount should be spent on encouraging the arts, music and paintings of the local economy which would increase the value of the country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Ahmed Abuelmagd | 55 | view |
- Some people believe that law changes human behaviour. Do you agree with it? 70
- In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is great idea or not.? 77
- What is your opinion on deducting marks on late assignment? 77
- Any recent invention that you think has proved detrimental or beneficial to society? 80
- Imitating celebrities in sports or movies is good or bad ? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, moreover, so, still, thus, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.5418719212 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 8.36945812808 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45017182131 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95576597067 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553264604811 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.5024630542 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.3899839425 50.4703680194 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.6 104.977214359 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1 20.9669160288 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.25397266985 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201602728193 0.242375264174 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077864688682 0.0925447433944 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655669031721 0.071462118173 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124034758841 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058492366228 0.0609392437508 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 12.6369458128 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.3980295567 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.