Traffic and housing problems in major cities could be solved by moving large companies and factories and their employees to the countryside. Do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, a number of people who live in modern cities have an upward trend. It leads to a lot of difficulties. Two of the big problems are traffic congestion and accommodation. Some people believe that moving both enormous companies, factories and their staffs to rural areas could tackle these troubles. I completely disagree with this opinion and the essay will discuss in detail.
To begin with, traffic jam is caused not only private but also public transportation. In other words, the number of workers does not the main reason which brings on traffic congestion. In short, although companies, firms, factories move to the countryside, the traffic jam still could happen. It is because road system and consciousness of citizens are the main reasons why traffic problem happens. For example, traffic jam hardly appears if people drive carefully and obey the law on road traffic. The solution is for the government to educate consciousness of people and updated road system. In spite of the fact that as long as a figure of employees go down, rush hour may reduce little, it is not really effective answer to solve traffic problems.
Secondly, the more city develop, the more is a number of people. In other words, even though the firms, factories leave to countryside, big cities are narrow and crowded. In short, the cities develop more and more, there will be more immigrants. It is the most important reason to cause housing problem.For example, Thai Nguyen city has many factories and company but it does not have housing trouble because it is on the mountain and does not really develop as other cities in Vietnam. To tackle this difficulty, the government should use well land square and invest in building.
In conclusion, moving firms and factories are not essential. Instead of that, the government could have some more possible and effective solutions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-26 | sonnn | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-03 | Nguyễn Xuân Sơn | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-03 | Nguyễn Xuân Sơn | 84 | view |
| 2020-04-15 | mabel_yangyang | 61 | view |
| 2018-06-03 | Thien Trang | 68 | view |
- Some people think that the main benefit of greater international cooperation is in the protection of environment while others think that it is in the world business. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school What are reasons What could be done 63
- Some people think success in the life comes from hard work and determination Others think money and appearance are more important Discuss both sides and give your opinion 78
- Some countries achieve international sports by building specialized facilities to train top athletes, instead of providing sport facilities that every can use. Do you think this is positive or negative development? 67
- Some people think that young people should go to university to further their education while others think that they should be encouraged to work as car mechanic or builder, etc to serve society. Discuss both opinion and give your own opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...portant reason to cause housing problem.For example, Thai Nguyen city has many fact...
^^^
Line 3, column 582, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ell land square and invest in building. In conclusion, moving firms and factorie...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, still, well, for example, in conclusion, in short, in other words, in spite of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02564102564 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67945650823 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.3287489975 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5263157895 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4210526316 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52631578947 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278745912126 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716298158801 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550874440647 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146866441688 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280322160119 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.