More and more people in the city live in homes with small spaces or no outdoor areas. Do you think it is a negative or positive development?
Modern lifestyle in the cities has lead people to a new adaptation of small accommodations with little to no outdoor areas. As an urban citizen, I believe such trend brings great benefits for the city residents.
To begin with, there are a few setbacks when choosing this type of living places. Firstly, settling in houses or apartments with limited space is quite inconvenient and unsuitable for people who possess a large amount of furniture. Often, these individuals prefer purchasing new accessories without wanting to dispose the old ones first. Thus, a small home would not be enough for both item storing and living. Secondly, outdoor areas will not be available to access immediately when people decide to have some activities or family sports. Instead, they will have to go to a nearby public areas or parks in order to participate in these sorts of activities, which could waste some time.
However, the benefits of living in small places are far more favorable. Since the price of personal accommodations has gone up drastically and quickly for the past recent years, individuals, especially immigrants from the remote areas, can save themselves a tremendous amount of money. Subsequently, this extra fund could be reallocate to some other important purposes such as children’s education, life expense, or private vehicles. Furthermore, with the establishment of more small apartments, the city authorities are able to rearrange the distribution of local residents and reorganize some areas. For example, building blocks and public parks in Ho Chi Minh City are now in separated areas and in an order, which makes the whole city look more organized.
In conclusion, while living in small spaces has some drawbacks, this tendency still proves to be a positive development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-02 | Akbar2017 | 61 | view |
| 2018-06-24 | drtruong92 | 84 | view |
| 2018-03-09 | eyraen | 67 | view |
| 2018-01-15 | Khoi Nguyen | 78 | view |
- Some people think that men and women have different qualities. Therefore, some certain jobs are suitable for men and some jobs are suitable for women. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Nowadays, international tourism is the biggest industry in the world. Unfortunately, international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures.Do you agree or disagree? 78
- A while ago you have lent a friend a suitcase, which he/she has not returned yet. Write a letter to him/her reminding to bring it back and say-What suitcase and when did he/she borrow it?-Why do you need it back?-What should he/she do about it? 73
- Space travel has been possible for some time and some people believe that space tourism could be developed in the future. Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 78
- Some people believe that educational success depends on good teachers. Others think that it depends on the attitude of the students. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 590, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'area'?
Suggestion: area
...they will have to go to a nearby public areas or parks in order to participate in the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28222996516 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94855467559 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634146341463 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4511451943 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.285714286 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3571428571 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281339210454 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904306196669 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807890793755 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163621477327 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398988003973 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.