The pie chart below show the main reason why agriculture land become less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of world during the 1990.
The first circular representation revels the information about the main reasons for the world wide degradation of agriculture land, and second lay out highlights the three regions: North America, Europe and Oceania. Which were affected by these cause in the year 1990. The data is calibrated in per centum.
It can be seen that, because of overgrazing, world wide 35% of land had been degradated. Apart from this, 30% of total became less productive due to deforestation. Moreover, over-cultivation and other had effected the productivity of land were 28% and 7% respectively.
Moving further, in Europe, peak area of land was being degraded in comparison to North America and Ocenia. Which was 23% of land. In addition to this, total 5% of land had degradated in North America. Because of deforestation 0.2% of land became less productive, following with 3.3 % due to Over-cultivation, and 1.5% of land as a result of Overgrazing. Furthermore, No land was being degraded by Over-cultivation at Oceania in the year 1990.
Overall, it is evident that both Overgrazing and Deforestation had played a significant role in degradation because of this, in Europe, maximum land became less productive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-17 | ThaoNHP | 78 | view |
| 2018-06-29 | Nikhil Sharma | 78 | view |
| 2018-06-29 | Nikhil Sharma | 78 | view |
| 2018-06-26 | Arshgill | 67 | view |
- Some sports are extremely dangerous but many people still like the very much. Why do people take part in dangerous sports? Give some suggestions on how to deal with these dangers. 67
- The two pie charts show the main sourses of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s. 56
- The table below shows the estimated oil capacity of six counties, in million of barrels per day during 1990 to 2010. 73
- Young people in disturbed economies tend to become violent causing distruction to life and property What the the cause and solution of this problem 77
- The chart below show the percentage of whole world population in four countries from 1950 to 2000, will projection till 2050. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
...ormation about the main reasons for the world wide degradation of agriculture land, and se...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
...ormation about the main reasons for the world wide degradation of agriculture land, and se...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ons: North America, Europe and Oceania. Which were affected by these cause in the ye...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... America, Europe and Oceania. Which were affected by these cause in the year 1990...
^^
Line 3, column 46, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
...n be seen that, because of overgrazing, world wide 35% of land had been degradated. Apart ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 46, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
...n be seen that, because of overgrazing, world wide 35% of land had been degradated. Apart ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...comparison to North America and Ocenia. Which was 23% of land. In addition to this, t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Furthermore, No land was being degraded by Over-cultivation at Oceania in the ye...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, apart from, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1011.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.265625 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32677188964 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604166666667 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.1917890459 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.25 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179847252209 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691228562484 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516836607072 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114205266509 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547608132338 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.