The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The given three circular charts highlight the information about variations in yearly expenditure of UK school in five different factors in three years: 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Overall, it is evident that insurance and teachers salaries was gradually increased, while other workers salaries decreased, and rest were fluctuated.
It can be seen that expenditure of UK school for teachers salaries was 40℅ which was followed by 15℅ for furniture equipment and resources such as books. Apart from this, less than fifth had been spent by UK school on salaries of other workers. However, the amount which UK school had spent on these five factors in year of 1991 show some variations. It had been surged to 20℅ in resources, and for teachers salaries it had soared to half of the total per centum. Moreover, the remaining three factors: insurance, furniture equipment and other workers salaries, the spendings of UK school was 3℅, 5℅ and 22℅ respectively.
In the year 2001, US school had spent less than tenth for insurance, and 23℅ for furniture equipment. In addition to this, 9℅ was spent on resources.Along with this, the expenditure for salaries of teachers and workers again plunged to 45℅ and 15℅ respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Sandhu param | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Noah1997 | 33 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 67 | view |
- The diagram below show how glass containers such as bottles are produced and recycled 76
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads? To what extent do u agree or disagree with the statement. 61
- The chart gives the information on the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. 67
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
- nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing ( for example, through cellphone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening. Do u think the advant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 150, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Along
...tion to this, 9℅ was spent on resources.Along with this, the expenditure for salaries...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, while, apart from, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7659356464 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0928603977 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192436999648 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916567741021 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0944654382218 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126371848385 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117094085971 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.