Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.
Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The topic we are given is easily debatable one. It claims we can learn more from the people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own. As a reason, it states that disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning and I completely agree with that.
It is true that when we disagree with some ideas it intrigues us to think more about the topic and find out actual true facts and reasons behind it. If we propose our ideas to the like-minded people and the people whose views we share, it is most likely possible that they will readily agree with them even though if there are some flaws. For example, in parliament, if we would only have the ruling party and all the bills are passed based on the votes of ruling party members, the bills which are passed would never be neutral. As we have the opposition party as well and their vote is also needed to pass a particular bill. All the pros and cons are debated and judged by both the parties which they claim as true. Which gives the opponent to seek more facts to support their claim and in return they are exposed to acquire more knowledge that provides a great learning.
Furthermore, contradicting ideas always compel us to go beyond our current leaning and to prove that the view which we hold is not wrong and sometimes it comes out as that the view we hold is not actually correct. That leads us to acquire the actual facts and reasons which increases the values of our knowledge and learning.
In conclusion, it is very important for one to go out their comfort zone and present their views to the people with whom the ideas differ and should consider the facts why they believe their views are true and look for the valid reasons if there are any. In this way, one can learn more and enrich their knowledge.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-08 | iRohan | 58 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | sushil koirala | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | priit | 58 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | Mohit Raghuvanshi | 58 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | vishucology | 50 | view |
- The following is a letter to the editor of the Waymarsh Times Traffic here in Waymarsh is becoming a problem Although just three years ago a state traffic survey showed that the typical driving commuter took 20 minutes to get to work the commute now takes 12
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 50
- The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 58
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 244, Rule ID: ACTUAL_EXPERIENCE[1]
Message: Use simply 'facts'.
Suggestion: facts
...y correct. That leads us to acquire the actual facts and reasons which increases the values ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, furthermore, if, look, so, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 329.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.47416413374 5.05705443957 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17122144575 2.79657885939 78% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492401215805 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1094661969 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.230769231 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3076923077 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 5.21951772744 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400609893019 0.243740707755 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146997670626 0.0831039109588 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148237398339 0.0758088955206 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274382294215 0.150359130593 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.19994401714 0.0667264976115 300% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 48.8420337079 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 12.1639044944 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 100.480337079 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.