Do you think formal written assessments in today's world to assess students’ performance is effective or not? Discuss your viewpoint on this and support your answer with examples.
There are several ways which are followed by the docents to evaluate the performance of students. Formal written assessment is one method which is used by them for the assessment of their performance. I think; this method is not effective. I will explain why formal written assessment method is not valid to assess the performance of the students in the upcoming paragraphs.
The first and foremost reason is that some students fail to appear in the written examination. Diseases like malaria, fever often catch to the students therefore they fail to participate in the examination. For example, the literacy rate is declining day-by day because the ratio of these diseases is also accelerating rapidly.
The second reason is that some pupil copy answers from other pupil because some are not confident about their knowledge. Some pupils do not take interest in writing the long essays. Such students sometimes fail but often take positions in the written examination, but in actual, they are unable to apply their knowable to solve practical problems of life. Not only the literacy rate but also well trained students are not an easy to find. There is a lack of well-educated students in the nation, thereby, unemployment rate is inclining gradually.
Therefore, I assert that written assessment is not an appropriate way to assess the performance of the students. I feel practical knowledge should be assessed by giving them some practical assignments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-26 | sidved123@gmail.com | 77 | view |
| 2019-05-21 | andrefreitas | 61 | view |
| 2019-04-26 | AkashPTEnikalo | 77 | view |
| 2019-03-22 | Rajnikant Chauhan | 77 | view |
| 2019-02-14 | arami | 88 | view |
- Many employers are now offering their employees the option to work from home.As a result, employees will have much more flexible working hours in the future. Is this a positive or negative development? 55
- As a result of advances in medical care, average life expectancy is increasing for men and women. Do you think most people will see this as a positive development? What are the disadvantages of an ageing population for individuals and society? Support you 72
- Overpopulation in some of the cities has led to enormous issues. Describe one or two problems which occurred owing to over population how individual and government can tackle with these issues. 75
- Learning a new language at an early stage is helpful for children. Is it positive for their future prospects or will it have some adverse effects? Do you agree or disagree? 68
- In the modern world it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is it a positive or negative development in your opinion? To what extent do you support this development? 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iseases is also accelerating rapidly. The second reason is that some pupil cop...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, therefore, well, for example, i feel, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1234.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 236.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22881355932 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86601098394 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 139.433497537 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521186440678 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 394.2 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.65517241379 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0032914645 50.4703680194 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.1428571429 104.977214359 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8571428571 20.9669160288 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 7.25397266985 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 6.9802955665 14% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211769423196 0.242375264174 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770910053288 0.0925447433944 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730458024566 0.071462118173 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131506344246 0.151781067708 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839437450837 0.0609392437508 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 12.6369458128 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.1260098522 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.