Company top level authorities should or should not take employee suggestions or ideas to take any decisions.

Essay topics:

Company top level authorities should or should not take employee suggestions or ideas to take any decisions.

It is undeniable fact that company’s top level always need to value their employees and make decisions according to their ground level of experience. This essay will outline the importance of valuable suggestions from staff for a company to thrive.

Firstly, most of the business staff work and stay with a company for a long time and they wanted to see their company grow successfully. To do that they need to feel included in decision making from their bosses or top managers. For example, all business relies on customers, to keep them happy all staff working in different level play a significant role. By keeping all this system moving well keeps a company in a better position.

Secondly, listening to employees ideas keep motivation alive and productivity stays higher. Such as, Implementing suggestions makes more sense then not listening which demotivates people to work hard, as long as any employees agenda is not harming business it should be considered by top level. Otherwise, this could have a negative effect on work satisfaction and may tarnish the reputation of a company.

To conclude, in my opinion, all decisions made by top-level authorities are going to impact employees and their suggestion should be heard and included all the time to secure success.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-26 Maheswari 80 view
2019-10-04 Roshanip 77 view
2019-10-04 Roshanip 77 view
2019-09-02 yasamin.gharib62 88 view
2019-08-29 rajujon 80 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user begraj1 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...plementing suggestions makes more sense then not listening which demotivates people ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 217, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...tes people to work hard, as long as any employees agenda is not harming business it shoul...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, then, well, for example, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1082.0 1207.87684729 90% => OK
No of words: 210.0 242.827586207 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15238095238 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86892807496 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614285714286 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 379.143842365 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8667781492 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.2 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.25397266985 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24690068402 0.242375264174 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904376142698 0.0925447433944 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735053938586 0.071462118173 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161636940775 0.151781067708 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551666979613 0.0609392437508 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 12.6369458128 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 55.0591133005 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.