Some people think it is a good thing for senior management positions to have very high salaries compared to other workers of the same company or organization. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The question of whether higher-position workers should attain more significant incomes then other colleagues at the same workplace remains a controversy. In my opinion, I gravitate towards the idea of reducing the gap between individuals’ salaries.
To begin with, it is true that the seniors in companies should earn more money than the rest because of their enormous responsibility. While ordinary workers only have to finish their tasks during the work hours, the managers have to revise and spot minor mistakes of all the handed documents before proceeding. In other words, the workloads from this job is intensively heavy. Thus, higher salaries for these people is reasonably understandable. Moreover, supervisors also have to reallocate a specific assignment to a suitable worker, which definitely requires outstanding managing skills from university’s training. Therefore, substantial incomes should be considered as an acceptable reward for the dedication to achieve such qualities.
However, a significant difference of the paychecks in the same organization’s unit should be decreased due to several issues associated with. Firstly, this tendency would raise a disagreement of income between workers and managers. When people are questioning about the salaries gap, they will probably stop concentrating on their jobs and start to postpone any given assignments, which is a major culprit of productiveness deterioration. Secondly, the connection and work relationship could be greatly damaged and could create tension in the working environment. As a result, group works will no longer be effective.
In conclusion, while people who take management positions indeed have valid reasons to gain bigger incomes, I believe the amount of money they attain should only be slightly differed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-28 | Nicolas | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-27 | Lê Võ Nhật Quang | 89 | view |
| 2018-10-04 | honza | 11 | view |
| 2018-08-17 | drtruong92 | 89 | view |
| 2018-07-31 | eyraen | 84 | view |
- While recruiting a new employee the employer should pay more attention to personal qualities rather than qualification and experience. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 78
- Foreign tourists should be charged more than local people when visiting cultural and historical attractions in that country To what extent do you agree or disagree 71
- Your friend has asked you about the course details you recently took in a training center In the letter you should Tell him about the course details Why your friend should take this course Explain how the course has benefited you 93
- In many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Some think this is good, while others believe this is a problem for a country. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- Some people think that media news has become much more influential in people's lives today and it is a negative development. Do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
The question of whether higher-position workers should attain m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
... should attain more significant incomes then other colleagues at the same workplace ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'salaries'' or 'salary's'?
Suggestion: salaries'; salary's
.... When people are questioning about the salaries gap, they will probably stop concentrat...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, in other words, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76951672862 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34204258327 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.676579925651 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5394829085 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.857142857 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.9285714286 7.06120827912 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164429673854 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505272101693 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390200615833 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0952149428607 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428274011438 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.