Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Laws, as a tool to define and regulate citizens' behaviors, have been coming into being for thousands of years. The statement claims that obeying just laws and disobeying and resisting unjust laws are the responsibilities for everyone in the world. In my opinion, citizens have obligations to conform to laws with the right to argue or challenge the unjust rules but not to disobey or subvert them.
Laws stand for authority, and they are considered as compulsory to be comply with when being setup. Obeying laws without considering whether it is just or unjust is a obligation for every citizen, and that is how a stable and secured society was formed. In Qin dynasty, the monarch Qinshihuang published a list of laws to for all the people in the countries once he had conquered and merged other nations which was teared apart due to war. Because of this publication, people in different areas have common rules to conform, thus the country has the power to fully unite all the parts. If someone was unruly to certain rules, he or she usually ended up a punishment or even death. Therefore, with the tradition and prototype descending to the society nowadays, people in China still believe in the unassailable power of laws. Without this power, a country could not last for long and could not sustain a stable community.
Certainly, it is true that unjust laws are flawed and may be unfair to certain groups of people, and thus they might need to be adjusted. However, the modification of laws should be taken in a proper and formal way, that means it needs to be negotiated by lawyers, government and scholars. People who consider certain rules are unjust can clarify with lawyers. In most of the cases, it is the person's narrow-minded opinion because he or she might not be proficient in laws. If it is a case that a law is against by a considerable amount of people including proponents who are knowledgeable in laws. A possible solution is to put forth the idea and bring it up for discussion, instead of resisting it.
Laws are important for a society to be sustainable, and the consequences of disobeying it can cause severe security problems for the country. When a law is subject to disputation, a formal discussion or further modification can be done in a way that is resourceful and proper.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Abhipray Singh | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | Jolly1111111 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | chapagain08 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | Bonjourkmm | 58 | view |
- A recent sales study indicates that consumption of seafood dishes in Bay City restaurants has increased by 30 percent during the past five years. Yet there are no currently operating city restaurants whose specialty is seafood. Moreover, the majority of f 42
- The following appeared in a memo from the new vice president of Sartorian, a company that manufactures men's clothing.Five years ago, at a time when we had difficulties in obtaining reliable supplies of high quality wool fabric, we discontinued production 69
- The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People should spend money on things that last a long time such as expensive pieces of jewelry than spend money on short term pleasures like vacations 47
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific solutions proposed in the reading passage. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...idering whether it is just or unjust is a obligation for every citizen, and that ...
^
Line 3, column 416, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'torn'.
Suggestion: torn
...ered and merged other nations which was teared apart due to war. Because of this publi...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 475, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...or she might not be proficient in laws. If it is a case that a law is against by a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, as for, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1910.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 400.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.775 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82045652333 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5075 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.3678643668 60.3974514979 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.111111111 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227149173115 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735294614393 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662284195583 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145071680646 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457476711054 0.0667264976115 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.