The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
The table below shows information on national consumer spending various items in five different countries in year 2002. The items mentioned are groceries, body apparel, and leisure or education.
Turkey has the highest percentage consumers spent on food, drinks, or tobacco with 32.14% while Sweden has the least with 15.77%. Every country on the shown table hit above 15%, illustrating that each country spend quite a lot on groceries, as it is essential to keep us alive and well.
Italy sits first when it comes to clothing or footwear with 9%, where as Sweden spend least on that with 3.60% lesser. On leisure or education category, Turkey becomes the most consumtive country compared to other countries, with 4.35% and Spain spend the least with 1.98%.
Overall, approximately Turkey has high percentages on those three categories mentioned, making them the most consumtive country compared to the other countries and Sweden possibly with the least consumtive country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-12 | meo03chan | view | |
| 2022-05-10 | thienhanguyen | 56 | view |
| 2022-05-10 | thienhanguyen | 11 | view |
| 2021-09-12 | meo03chan | view |
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 56
- Some people spend their lives working and have little interest in their leisure and hobbies. Others spend their time on leisure and hobbies.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- Many people believe that inherent talent is more important than practice in many fields like sport, or music, according to them. Great musicians and sportsmen are born and cannot be created. However, others claim that talent has little to do with success 56
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 61
- The chart below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 65, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
... comes to clothing or footwear with 9%, where as Sweden spend least on that with 3.60% l...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 828.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34193548387 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59049732267 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625806451613 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1664902472 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.285714286 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277201197975 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149423571144 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.215637344193 0.0843802449381 256% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194049950436 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.202254383319 0.0819641961636 247% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.