Some people think government should focus on reducing environmental pollution and housing problems to help people prevent illness and disease. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is perceived by many that if governments focus on reducing pollution of environment as well as issues related houses, disease and illness can be prevented. Personally, I partly agree with the opinion.
With regard to the positiveness of the matter, there are some benefits of reducing environmental pollution and housing issues. The first merit is that if governments carry out many practical solutions to protect environment such as constructing more green fields in cities and decreasing the number of vehicles traveling on streets, the air tend to be cleaner and fresher. Therefore, people can prevent illness caused by polluted air. For example, those who live in a clean country such as Singapore tend to less get sick caused by dirty air, compared to other countries which are less clean than it. The second merit is that when housing matters are solved, people can stop causes of health problems. Indeed, if there are more houses or apartments in countries, residents will have more spaces to live. As a result, people will not concentrate at some places, which declines the infection between people if infectious diseases happen.
Besides protecting residents’ health by dealing with pollution and housing trouble, governments can do more various ways to improve health of their citizens. The first one is that governments can do useful propagandas about doing exercise which brings a lot of benefits for people’s health. Moreover, residents need to be aware of keeping their health by themselves before governments do anything to help them. As a result, problems related health can be tackled with their efforts. For instance, those who often go to gym have a tendency to be healthy, so they are not easy to get common sick such as fever or snivel. The second solution is governments should invest their budgets in medical researches so that people can treat the sickness efficiently.
In conclusion, I partly agree with the opinion that people can prevent illness and disease if governments only focus on resolving environmental pollution and housing issues because there are more different useful solutions for health problem as aforementioned analysis.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-01 | ketan | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | Sukhwant Singh | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-28 | Maylyn Phan | 78 | view |
| 2018-11-02 | uniooo | 67 | view |
| 2018-09-24 | SN047 | 73 | view |
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problemsTo what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- Instead of trying to prevent climate change, people should find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Instead of trying to prevent climate change, people should find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think that employers should not care about the way their employees dress, because what matters is the quality of their work. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people think government should focus on reducing environmental pollution and housing problems to help people prevent illness and disease To what extent do you agree or disagree 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1840.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27220630372 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86776400876 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527220630372 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4483123664 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8125 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3125 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28907561702 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103209587006 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786287990193 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195475390821 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494134412222 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.