Cashless society.
In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people about the positive and negative effects on the society due to the cashless market and the benefits form digital payments. While it is possible to claim that the cashless society has many security issues, my point of view that the digital market and the digital payments outweigh the disadvantages. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view while analysing different points of the argument.
First and foremost, there are myriad of advantages a society can gain from digital payments, such as security, quality, availability and integrity. Apart from that, personal hygiene and sustainability development also play a major role in this. For example, In Sri Lanka has been developed a payment system called “PAY APP” by Sampath bank, and this large-scale information system provides a large number of benefits for the customer. Therefore, it is believed that the digital payments are the future of payment in this globe.
On the other hand, those who believe the negative side of the argument has a different point of view and argue that the digital payment system removes the security of the payments. For example, a hacker can hack an information system with sensitive data such as credit card information and can misuse that information. Therefore, it is considered that the digital payment system can remove all the money from a customer bank account. But, there are high quality and well secure information system are available to full fill this requirement.
In conclusion, it is strongly believed that the cashless society is the future of the world, and everyone should do the digital transactions through payment gateways. In nutshell, it is believed that the government and the professionals should improve the quality of this in a cognitive manner.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-31 | Behnaz fallah | 88 | view |
| 2021-07-23 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 88 | view |
| 2021-07-23 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 85 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | MojtabaKarami | 80 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | MojtabaKarami | 85 | view |
- Consumers should avoid over package products. 55
- The environment we are living is in danger due to various problems. What are the underlyingcauses? Who do you think should be responsible to solve it? Is it the governments, organization or each individual? what measures? 77
- The information revolution has changed the ways of mass communication and had some negative and positive effects on individuals’ lives as well as on society. To what extent you are agreed or disagree? 80
- The majority of television news being reported is bad news: wars, famines, accidents and crime. Some people think that television news should be a mixture of good and bad news. 75
- Healthy body is more reliant on healthy diet than exercise. Do you agree? Share your personal experience to support the statement. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 401, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...large-scale information system provides a large number of benefits for the customer. Therefore, i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 273, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a cognitive manner" with adverb for "cognitive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...nals should improve the quality of this in a cognitive manner.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, well, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21140939597 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80874888734 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506711409396 0.580463131201 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 497.7 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4488780357 50.4703680194 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.461538462 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.25397266985 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0554769259315 0.242375264174 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.022890958782 0.0925447433944 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419101701952 0.071462118173 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0434493992159 0.151781067708 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439809611764 0.0609392437508 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.