The map below shows the development of a seaside village between 1995 and present.
The maps illustrate the development which took place in a seaside village from 1995 to now. Overall, the biggest change was in the southeast, in which the farmland and forest park turned into golf and tennis fields. Meanwhile, in the southern part, the fishing port was demolished, while hotel and cafe remained untouched.
In 1995, the farmland, which was used for farming and raising cattle but after that this area was restructured into a golf field. Similarly, most of the forest park was cut down to build new tennis fields, which situated in the south next to the golf. Furthermore, in the northwest, which was constructed more houses along the road for residents. Besides that, the road near the household area was extended to the west with more new houses.
In the other side, the hotel and cafe were unchanged over the period. There was a new car park, which located nearby the hotel for customers parking their cars. Moreover, all the shops were restructured into restaurants and the fish market chain was rebuilt into apartments. Especially, the fishing port area was knocked down in the south.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-05 | Lily Ha | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | chichinn | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | Manh1003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | @helloooooo.1234 | 11 | view |
| 2023-06-30 | anaiseishere | 11 | view |
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. 61
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 56
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.Discuss both th 67
- Comparison of Energy Production. The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in 2 years. 73
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, moreover, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94652406417 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48876338908 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582887700535 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.303482582 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.0909090909 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0645479001848 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0344953099628 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0970132675111 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0591386276572 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.071382385244 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.