According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actually increased during the last year. Clearly, the content of these reviews is not reaching enough of our prospective viewers. Thus, the problem lies not in the quality of our movies but with public's lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available. Super Screen should therefore allocate a greater quantity of its budget next year to reaching the public through advertising."
During past year fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in other year. This statement clearly implies that before the last year there were viewers than the last year Which implies that people had the reach to these movies before but may be because the movies did not perform well that is why the viewers are plunged. Had it been the qualities of movies better the numbers of viewers will automatically increase. Reviews of last to last year movies may not as good as it has to be to attract viewers, because of that people are eschewing from watching Super Screen-produced movies.
Moreover, the reviewers who has given positive reviews about the Super Screen-produced movies are the not most credible source for the public. Viewers also consider the creduility of the source from which the reviews are generated. May be people doesn't consider the reviewers enough creadible that they can trust on their reviews as most of the times it happens that critics are often bribed to review positive about the movie. Here, the case is public is fully aware about the positive review of the movie but still not actually going to watch it.
Also, production is one of the important part of the movie but what about the direction, story, characters etc. which plays significant factor to decide whether the reviews are positive or negative. If the Super Screen-producer start analyzing the movies which are most beautifully written and directed movie and has got the positive reviews. Analyzing may help to decide which combination of director, screen cast and storywriter producing the favourable positive reviews. This is how the producer can instill the best combination in the movie and get the desired good reviews along with the increased viewers too.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-24 | Cynic | 43 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | nimesh94 | 42 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | mcmaster | 33 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | pooja.kakde@gmail.com | 59 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | a251ravind | 63 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007. 73
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 50
- According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies act 23
- An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition. 58
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: Viewers also consider the creduility of the source from which the reviews are generated.
Error: creduility Suggestion: credulity
Sentence: May be people doesn't consider the reviewers enough creadible that they can trust on their reviews as most of the times it happens that critics are often bribed to review positive about the movie.
Error: creadible Suggestion: credible
Sentence: Analyzing may help to decide which combination of director, screen cast and storywriter producing the favourable positive reviews.
Error: favourable Suggestion: favorable
Error: storywriter Suggestion: story writer
----------------------------
samples:
https://www.testbig.com/gmatgre-argument-task-essays/following-taken-me…
----------------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 3 2
No. of Sentences: 12 15
No. of Words: 293 350
No. of Characters: 1452 1500
No. of Different Words: 146 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.137 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.956 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.575 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 102 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 74 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 45 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 27 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.417 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.976 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.75 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.41 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.592 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.154 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...he reviews are generated. May be people doesnt consider the reviewers enough creadible...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, may, moreover, so, still, well, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 28.8173652695 52% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 55.5748502994 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 16.3942115768 30% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 2260.96107784 66% => OK
No of words: 292.0 441.139720559 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07876712329 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.56307096286 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61095270522 2.78398813304 94% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 204.123752495 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.468620217663 107% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 705.55239521 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.027407827 57.8364921388 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.076923077 119.503703932 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 23.324526521 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76923076923 5.70786347227 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 5.15768463074 58% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.20758483034 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.88822355289 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.480147565012 0.218282227539 220% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191914788675 0.0743258471296 258% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14993644117 0.0701772020484 214% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.323427311249 0.128457276422 252% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589548696062 0.0628817314937 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.3799401198 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.3550499002 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.32208582834 97% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 98.500998004 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.