The advanced medical technology will expand human's life. Do you think it is a blessing or a curse?
Recently the advanced medical technology has sparked a heated controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "is it a blessing or curse?". Whereas, it is a widely held view that expanding human's life is beneficial. I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the biotechnological standpoint, life expectancies are bound up inextricably with medical cares, which indicates they lead to both genetic researches and medical improvements. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2015 demonstrates the relationship between healthy diets and weight control as well as an exponential increase in the age bracket. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of biochemical drugs is correlated positively with not only age-friendly services but also longevities.
Within the realm of society, without the slightest doubt, advanced medical devices attribute to increased population, in that it would come down to clinical cares, academic hospitals, and painful diseases. A salient example of such attribution is a long life, which is a cause of concern since it was mistaken to take vaccinations for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars have had the opportunity to pinpoint mortality rates problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to retirements, an unbalanced rate of aged citizens, and even pensions. Hence, it is correct to infer the pivotal role of the new medical progressions in society.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that increasing life expectancy with the aid of medical technology is a blessing. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive that the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-14 | neelu sharma | 72 | view |
| 2019-08-03 | Rahul Luthra | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-14 | Sidra018 | 88 | view |
| 2019-05-27 | msgnaneswaran | 77 | view |
| 2019-04-27 | Ammu helen | 74 | view |
- Some people claim that instead of having to prepare for huge number of exams in schools, children should learn more. To what extend do you agree with this statement? Use your own experience to support your ideas. 77
- What do you think are the strengths and weakness of the education system in your country. Use your own experience to support your idea. 88
- Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree? 80
- Some universities deduct students' work if assignment is given late. What is your opinion and suggest some alternative actions? 88
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Other however believe that school is the place to learn this Discuss both these views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...'is it a blessing or curse?'. Whereas, it is a widely held view that expandin...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...it is a widely held view that expanding humans life is beneficial. I will discuss the ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66894197952 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25426934359 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 139.433497537 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675767918089 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.058509176 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.642857143 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233276596849 0.242375264174 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666453138357 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860626860583 0.071462118173 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151983845083 0.151781067708 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133777600987 0.0609392437508 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 12.6369458128 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.