The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Heroes and role models can surely represent its society. It reflects the accepted norms by seeing in these role models’ traits. A society’s role models must be praised by the member of the society. They should be relied on the society’s conventions. In this aspect, we can understand the character of a society is to analyze the its heroes and its role models.
For example, the lionized characters in the USA are generally related with either freedom or science. Now look at the US society, they are called majorly their freedom in any topic or field such as the LGBTQ community is legalized firstly in the US lands or freedom of religion and the attitude against to religion discrimination has been accepted in the US lands. Another point is related with the US is indubitably science. The USA is the locomotive country in the world in terms of science. It cannot be coincidence that majority of scientists has done their work or inventions in that country even they are not the citizen of the US. For example, erudite physicist Albert Einstein has attracted the attention about his relativity theory primarily in Princeton University in the US. He was German but he cannot live as a German. Even, he has attended the Manhattan Project against to Germany. For this reason, in my opinion, he is one of the best scientists who has been grown in the US lands and can be accepted the role model by the US society. There are still a lot of bright scientists who emulate to Einstein in the US. Albert Einstein is one of the important scientist who achieved the importance in the US lands. There are a variety of different examples in the US history. In summary, as it is in the US, a society can create their own heroes and role models according to their truths and morality.
However, the society consists of a diversity of classes. Each part has different expectations and different qualities. In short, it is not possible to gather all people in one roof. My argument could comprise a majority of society but not all. For example, everyone knows the inventor of telephone, Galileo. He may be a role model of Italian society but who knows the cultivation of grains firstly? I think, no one, I am included. We owe our daily diet to grains but we do not know its founder. He or she also might be a hero or role model to its society if it is known. In my point, selected heroes and role models might not be as it should be. For this reason, overshadowed people cannot be ignored by the history. To sum up, only looking to society’s heroes and role models is not the best way to realize the society’s structure. There is surely considerable amount of people who has not gained the fame and not known today but they are also important.
As a conclusion, the society includes all people and cannot understood by just several heroes and role models. However, I must admit that its contribution is appreciable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-03 | Zahid6400 | 66 | view |
| 2024-01-26 | LauraTing | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | Isolus | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | wopona8219 | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | rickxiangx | 83 | view |
- Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the new vice president of Sartorian, a company that manufactures men's clothing."Five years ago, at a time when we had difficulties in obtaining reliable supplies of high quality wool fabric, we discontinued productio 72
- Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagre 50
- The following appeared as a recommendation by a committee planning a ten-year budget for the city of Calatrava."The birthrate in our city is declining: in fact, last year's birthrate was only one-half that of five years ago. Thus, the number of students e 37
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this role' or 'these roles'?
Suggestion: this role; these roles
...eflects the accepted norms by seeing in these role models' traits. A society's r...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 341, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'its'?
Suggestion: the; its
...he character of a society is to analyze the its heroes and its role models. For exam...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, so, still, for example, i think, in short, in summary, such as, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 57.0 33.0505617978 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2421.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 516.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69186046512 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76609204519 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76922387961 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.436046511628 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 782.1 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 6.24550561798 256% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.2370786517 163% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.4413783356 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.3636363636 118.986275619 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6363636364 23.4991977007 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21212121212 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.83258426966 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18649205697 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542002054563 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740514300881 0.0758088955206 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150450322732 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070442391331 0.0667264976115 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 14.1392134831 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 48.8420337079 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.1639044944 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.