A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Students who live in same country, take same exams to build their future. They have to take the university entrance exams to get admitted by the universities. For this reason, their chances should be equal in this marathon. In this aspect, I agree with the argument which is shown in the above. They should study the same national curriculum until they enter college. However, there are several situations that they should not take mutual curriculum.
First of all, I defended to give all students same curriculum but there are some special students in every nation. One group of these excepted groups is the students who have learning disabilities. This kind of students would struggle to follow normal curriculum and it cannot help their improvements. They need special curriculum, it is not necessary to include math or science or other lectures. A well-prepared special curriculum would improve their current situation. For this reason, mutual curriculum is not practical for all students.
Secondly, the opposite side of my first argument, second group of these excepted groups is the students who are genius, extremely smart, having IQ higher than 160. Their number is pretty low but they are living amongst us. They cannot be deemed with normal students. Their abilities are far more than we imagine. If they are taking same curriculum with other students, they would surely get bored every class and their attention would be distracted because they do not learn anymore in the class. They already know what it is. It will affect both the teacher and other students. This kind of students should take special curriculum which is determined by the specialists even may be by psychiatrists. In this example also proves all student cannot be subjected completely the same curriculum.
Moreover, there is a point which might consider us. Students who are interested in sport, art and music. These fields generally require the hard-wired abilities. Majority of them were born with their ability. For this reason, they do not need take intensive math or comprehensive science. Additionally, there are a lot of special schools which train the gifted students in terms of art, sport and music, according to their interest field before college. These schools’ curriculums are also different than normal students. Because, these students will probably follow their special interest in the college. For this reason, they will not need regular lectures.
As a conclusion, I agree with the idea which has been supported by the author. All normal, average students should study same curriculum to be equal in the marathon go through the universities. However, the specials students are always existed. They need special treatment and exclusive-prepared different curriculum.
- If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting yo 16
- The following appeared in a memo from the new vice president of Sartorian, a company that manufactures men's clothing."Five years ago, at a time when we had difficulties in obtaining reliable supplies of high quality wool fabric, we discontinued productio 72
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 77
- Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently 50
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Quiot Manufacturing."During the past year, Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on-the-job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant, where the work shifts are one hour shorter than 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...f these excepted groups is the students who are genius, extremely smart, having IQ high...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 244, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[3]
Message: Did you mean 'to take'?
Suggestion: to take
...lity. For this reason, they do not need take intensive math or comprehensive science...
^^^^
Line 7, column 506, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...ls' curriculums are also different than normal students. Because, these student...
^^^^
Line 7, column 528, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...re also different than normal students. Because, these students will probably follow th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2344.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 443.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29119638826 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74876839193 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47855530474 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 717.3 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 22.0 6.24550561798 352% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 34.0 20.2370786517 168% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 23.0359550562 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.032078725 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 68.9411764706 118.986275619 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.0294117647 23.4991977007 55% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.79411764706 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.83258426966 310% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261750571154 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757976034433 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687218585417 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179056846433 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465327911027 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 48.8420337079 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.51 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.2143820225 64% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.