Some people suggest that each family should only have one car and encourage alternative vehicle.
To what extent do you agree or disagree.
In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people about the public and private transportation and its courses related to a family. While it is possible to claim that a family can purchase more vehicles, my point of view that one vehicle is enough for a normal family while keeping public transport. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view while analysing different sides of the argument to a greater extent.
First and foremost, there are myriad of benefits a family can gain from their private vehicles such as confidentiality, integrity, availability, usability, security and life-quality. For example, Chinees government has established bank loans for all families to purchase a private car. Therefore, it is taken into consideration that the private vehicles are an essential tool in the modern day.
On the other hand, those who used more than one vehicle in their family add more carbon dioxide for the environment and increase more toxic gases into the air. For instance, England government has not limited the number of vehicles for a family, and as a nation they increase the global warming as well as the environment pollution. Therefore, it is taken in to account that one vehicle is the best limit for a family.
In conclusion, it is believed that alternative vehicles should be banned by the governments. In nutshell, it is strongly believed that the governments and professionals should take some cognitive actions to control the vehicle limits for a family.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-19 | chetan03sharma | 11 | view |
| 2018-11-13 | thanuja | 77 | view |
- It is important to maintain a right balance of your work and other respects of one’s life such as family and leisure, sport. What is your opinion about this? Discuss with appropriate examples. 77
- Cultural Shock is a new worrying concern for few immigrants. What are the few possible options to eradicate this? 77
- The time people devote in job leaves very little time for personal life. How widespread is theproblem? What problem will this shortage of time cause? 80
- In the last century when human astronaut first arrived on the Moon he said Space exploration is a big step for mankind But some pleople think it makes little difference to our daily life To what extent do you agree or disagree 64
- The way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1259.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 247.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0971659919 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94306087328 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550607287449 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.0 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.286137387 50.4703680194 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.454545455 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4545454545 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8181818182 7.25397266985 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0981735869482 0.242375264174 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413859079756 0.0925447433944 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0268462164927 0.071462118173 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0629078449171 0.151781067708 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209346463652 0.0609392437508 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.