A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
I do not agree that a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. While this strategy may provide a standard measure, by which colleges can compare students for admission, this strategy is much more disadvantageous to individual students' development of interests and unique expressions of self during a time when students should be encouraged to explore a variety of interests. Rather than spending time and effort on adhering to a set national curriculum, students should be urged and allowed to explore individual passions and pursuits that may better serve their long-term goals in life.
For example, a student who is forced to follow a set national curriculum before entering college is restricted to the types of studies that the nation deems important or appropriate. However, from an early age, a student may already have a set idea of various interests that he or she wants to pursue, such as culinary or musical interests. Instead of stifling this interest, a school should provide the appropriate resources for the student to explore and learn more about his or her interests within the school curriculum. From an early age, if a student is allowed to take culinary classes or musical history classes as part of his or her curriculum, it would help the student determine at a much earlier age whether this passion may be a life-long pursuit. Then he or she could start preparing for his or her career earlier and waste less time, effort, and money on extraneous classes.
Even in the alternative case, in which students may not know from an early age what their interests are, a customized curriculum that is not set by the nation can provide much more freedom for the students to explore a variety of subjects and fields that will quicken the process for students to realize what their interests may be. For example, a student who has yet to determine what his or her interests may be can take a customized curriculum that includes a variety of introductory classes to a diverse set of topics, such as art and math and computer programming. Through this exploration of a variety of classes, a student is also given more opportunity to discover their passions and interests at an earlier age.
While having the same national curriculum may seem easier for colleges to pick students for admission at first, considering the alternative provides a much more diverse college population and a better picture of applicants for colleges to choose more wisely. Picking applicants for colleges has become a mundane tasks where students are simply mechanically producing the necessary numbers for admission. Students are reduced to statistics. However, with customized curriculums, colleges can get a more well-rounded picture of a student by seeing their interests through their choices in curriculum.
For example, when a pool of applicants have taken the same nationional curriculum, the only way a college can determine the "best" applicants is by looking at the GPA. This does not reveal much about the individual students, as it only presents an extremely narrow picture of the student. However, if students are allowed to customize their curriculum, a college can look at the types of classes that students picked and excelled in to see whether the student would be a great match for the school's mission and type of student body. For a liberal arts college, a student that excelled in a curriculum that focused in arts would be a better fit than the student who got a 4.0 GPA in a national curriculum but whose interests are in computer science.
For reasons that are advantageous to both students and colleges, a customized curriculum provides both parties with benefits in the long run. Students can explore and discover passions and interests at an earlier age without wasting resources on their part and the colleges'. In addition, colleges can have better and more accurate methods of choosing students who would contribute and flourish better at their institution. For these reasons, I do not think that a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | AlmeeC. | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lekuleku | 62 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | nikhil40507 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | greuela001 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | vineel | 58 | view |
- “Over the past year, our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station’s coverage of w 42
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...much more disadvantageous to individual students development of interests and unique exp...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 502, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'schools'' or 'school's'?
Suggestion: schools'; school's
... student would be a great match for the schools mission and type of student body. For a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, so, then, well, while, for example, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 27.0 12.4196629213 217% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 31.0 14.8657303371 209% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 84.0 58.6224719101 143% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3519.0 2235.4752809 157% => OK
No of words: 695.0 442.535393258 157% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06330935252 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.13447686263 4.55969084622 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84245906233 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 215.323595506 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.389928057554 0.4932671777 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1116.0 704.065955056 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.3187617972 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.0 118.986275619 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2173913043 23.4991977007 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26086956522 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33868434706 0.243740707755 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146572799705 0.0831039109588 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.223444342574 0.0758088955206 295% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235521702082 0.150359130593 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135521975503 0.0667264976115 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 48.8420337079 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 100.480337079 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.