The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The bar chart compares the frequency of people in the USA eating at fast food restaurants from 2003 to 2013. Overall, during the ten years, the percentage of people eating out once a week and once or twice a month was always the largest while that of those doing so every day and never the smallest.
Starting with the frequency of every day, several times a week, once a week and never, there was a downward trend in the proportion of people going to fast food restaurants during the ten years. A significant decrease was in once a week from about 32% in 2003 to 28% in 2013, with a peak at 34% in 2006. The same trend could also be seen in several times a week, but its percentage dropped less obviously to 16% from 17%, despite a peak at 20% in 2006. The number of people eating fast food both every day and never declined in the first three years by 1%, from 4% to 3% and from 5% to 4% respectively, and then in the following years it remained stable.
Turning now to once or twice a month and a few times a year, the figures presented an upward trend over the period of the ten years. The date of once or twice a month experienced a greater rise from 30% to 34%, with a sharp dip at 25% in 2006. Also, the proportion of the other frequency first rose moderately to 15% in 2006 from 13%, and then leveled off until 2013.
- The bar chart shows the percentage of dependents in five different countries around the world in 2000 and 2050 85
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of the silkworm and the stages in the production of silk cloth. 78
- nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced? 67
- Some people think that individuals can do nothing to improve the environment, and the government and big companies can make a difference. To what extent you agree or disagree? 61
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1071.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 256.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.18359375 4.92477711251 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27054624463 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48828125 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.784658638 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4444444444 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152695378229 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830985264495 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120233948355 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123145738976 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0871533620038 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.9 61.2550243902 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.26 11.4140731707 64% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.