Some people think governments should spend money on faster means of public transport. However, others think money should be spent on other priorities. Discuss both views?
In recent years, budget allocation has been under fire in many countries. People are divided in their opinion regarding that government should spend loud budgets on modern public transports or the investment of national funding on other priorities are more important. Let us examine both views before reaching a concrete decision.
On the one hand, it is essential to recognize that bringing the straightforward access , innovative public transports have contributed significantly for the growth of economy. To be more specific, the mobility of population and exchanging the commodities could be promoted rapidly through high-quality means of the transport systems which could create enormous profits as well as effective economy for people. A good case in this point is that the mushrooming economy of Singapore where is thanks to the public transport network to neighbouring countries and vicinities. Moreover, faster movements of public means have dramatically supported in encouraging people in order to use public transports which not only assist to save time and energy for travelling but also reduce air pollution.
On the other hand, it is equally pivotal to acknowledge that improving the education system should be highly interested by authorities. It is undeniable that education is considered as efficient measure which is believed as shortcut to success of individuals, eliminating the illiteracy and shaking off the poverty. In fact, the outstanding of education systems registers the important role to the prosperity and well-being of a country. Therefore, government are recommended to invest loud budgets on the improvement of education.
From the reason mentioned above, it appeals to me that construction of modern public transport are crucial for the growth of nation’s economy and increasing convenience for people’s living standard. However, government should allocate equally budgets for the necessary demands for citizens.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-27 | maikhanh29194 | 89 | view |
- Students in university should be specialized in one subject rather than to develop a wider range of many different subjects To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 87
- Students in university should be specialized in one subject rather than to develop a wider range of many different subjects. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. 84
- Some people believe that students in school should study in groups to learn better Other people think that school student should study alone Discuss both views and give you own opinion 81
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views 89
- Some people think governments should spend money on faster means of public transport. However, others think money should be spent on other priorities. Discuss both views? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 87, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...that bringing the straightforward access , innovative public transports have contr...
^^
Line 8, column 302, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for the necessary demands for citizens.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, in fact, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72013651877 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15646991554 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600682593857 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2997212615 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.923076923 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229680853108 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730089236364 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606073206602 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12958309218 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387072652182 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.33 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.