International tourism has brought enormous benefit to many places. At the same time, there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment. Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages?
International tourism has increased in the past recent years. It has been noticed that foreign tourists like to explore untouched places. It is commonly believed that international tourism helps a nation to develop. Others think that it is affecting adversely to the local population and environment. This essay will examine benefits as well as drawbacks of international tourism.
On one hand, international tourism energizes the local economy. Foreign visitors like to spend a lot on stays, food and buying local arts. This boosts the country's economy by injecting foreign currency into the system. For example, a recent survey conducted out by the Goa government showed that the number of resorts has doubled up in the last two years in the Goa due to international tourism. Moreover, this helped in creating new job opportunities for the native people.
On the other hand, international tourism can lead to many issues such as pollution, deforestation and many more. Firstly, an increase in the number of international tourists requires more places to stay with better facilities. Hence, local people are building more resorts. Developing a new resort causes deforestation and eventually devastate nature and environment. Secondly, foreign tourists generally do not care about the local environment and they tend to litter everywhere. The recent report published by the Kerala government showed that the amount of rubbish generated by local resorts is increasing at an alarming pace. Finally, foreign nationals do not value the local cultures and historical monuments. For instance, people often write their names on national monuments which results in severe damage to ancient artifacts.
In conclusion, although there can be short-term advantages of international tourism, however, one should consider the cons as well. There are more downsides as compared to advantages of international tourism.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-08 | Ojlw | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-21 | ishpinder45 | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-21 | ishpinder45 | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-12 | atefdodo | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-12 | atefdodo | 84 | view |
- News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures. Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words. What is your opinion about this? 61
- News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures. Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words. What is your opinion about this? 67
- International tourism has brought enormous benefit to many places. At the same time, there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment. Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages? 78
- In some countries university students live at home with their families while they study whereas in other countries students attend University in another city Do you think the benefits of living far away from home during the university outweigh the disadva 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 836, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in severe damage to ancient artifacts. In conclusion, although there can be sho...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54794520548 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02103714238 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592465753425 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0467389592 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316464351863 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0972602597138 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780618604231 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206919936198 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0574549536094 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.