Cars come in all different shapes and sizes. Some prefer a large one, while others a compact one. What are the advantages and disadvantages of each type and which would you prefer?
Recently, the phenomenon of different types of cars and their shapes and sizes has sparked a heated debate. although contested by many that large cars are highly beneficial, such issue might be regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that a compact car can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the driving standpoint, small cars can provide individuals with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that parking spots and finding park are intertwined inextricably with not only small-sized cars but also crowded cities. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered traffic congestion. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both small cars and taking less space apparently can be seen.
Within the family point of view, large cars might increase the consequences of specious transportations. Moreover, fundamental aspects of going to picnic would relate to this reality that the demerits of travelling with all members of family pertain to enough seats. As a tangible example, a scientific study undertaken by a prestigious university has assertd that the downside of large vehicles is correlated nagatively with carbon dioxide emission. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of family upbringing.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of compact cars far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of their sizes prove the significance of their functions, but also pinpoint its useful implications.
Total Word Count: 260
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-21 | venkatesh1018 | 62 | view |
| 2019-08-04 | Carol Yuen | 55 | view |
| 2019-06-15 | nalaikgenious | 62 | view |
| 2019-06-03 | 76navkhehra | 77 | view |
| 2019-06-03 | 76navkhehra | 55 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
... and sizes has sparked a heated debate. although contested by many that large cars are h...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 264.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48106060606 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09241041599 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651515151515 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4384113246 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.307692308 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53846153846 7.25397266985 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 2.91625615764 240% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143430458757 0.242375264174 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0447645181499 0.0925447433944 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0343093834509 0.071462118173 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0641169570294 0.151781067708 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395689242193 0.0609392437508 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 12.6369458128 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.