space exploration. good or money wasting?
Recently, the phenomenon of space exploration and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that saving money is highly beneficial, such issue might be regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that spending money can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the astronomy's standpoint, space investigations can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that space travelers and higher astronomists are intertwined inextricably with not only space tourisms but also the space crafts. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered space interactions. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both UFOs and strangers apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of economic science, spending on space exploration might increase the consequences of wasting money. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the inflation rate would relate to this reality that the demerits of creating space crafts pertain to lower economic growth. As a tangible example, a scientific study undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of investing in space trips is correlated negatively with the more poor people. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of economic disadvantages.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both side, I profoundly believe that the benefits of space research far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of economic impacts prove the significance of the astronomy science, but also pinpoint its crucial implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-18 | honorrr | 77 | view |
| 2021-02-18 | honorrr | 80 | view |
| 2020-10-25 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | kbalavenka | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Maheswari | 77 | view |
- keeping animal in zoos and animal rights 88
- age discrimination at work 85
- When computers first appeared on the scene, it was thought they would make us more productive in providing goods and services, smarter and possibly happier. Skeptics claim that the opposite is true as computers have proved disappointing in terms of produc 85
- Do you think English will remain to be a global language despite globalization? 72
- A competitive environment in school and university would bring excellence and need to be encouraged. To what extent do you agree or disagree？ 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67567567568 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22419484332 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633204633205 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9718598335 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.5 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223146938536 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710400488083 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688490204907 0.071462118173 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119209216262 0.151781067708 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488883579908 0.0609392437508 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.65 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.