Students today can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. Do you agree or disagree?
There is a considerable debate among people over whether acquiring the information on the Internet nowadays is becoming easier in comparison with that in the past. Although it is undeniable that the online sources of information are more advantages than libraries, I suppose that traditional libraries are still a great need for students.
On the one hand, accessing information online has many benefits. Firstly, the online sources contain an enormous amount of information which can be much greater than any conventional libraries. This allows Internet users to go online and get the necessary information which is not fully mentioned in the books borrowing from libraries. Secondly, searching online information can be faster and more convenient. In fact, not only students can acquire information and knowledge without any traveling but they can also look for information on the Internet whenever they want, whereas libraries are just active in the specific office hours. Consequently, going online may be better for students who have a busy schedule and live far away from local libraries.
On the other hand, I believe that traditional libraries cannot be replaced by online sources due to their special features. Indeed, libraries can give individuals a quiet place which is an ideal environment for students to study with the highest concentration. For example, some of my friends confirm that studying in the school library is likely to be less distracted by noise and other people. Additionally, since everyone can post information on the Internet, the online sources seem to not be reliable for learning. That is the reason why students still need libraries whose materials are censored carefully in order to provide precise information for readers.
In conclusion, it is certainly true that online development have benefited students efficiently in terms of online information but this by no means decreases the importance of libraries.
- The pie charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009. 73
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting healthy lifestyle to prevent illness than to spend it on of the treatment of those who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Students today can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
- Hellooooo 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, still, whereas, for example, i suppose, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4262295082 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96862388344 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560655737705 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0980940053 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.214285714 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3571428571 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179616513245 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727288920803 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360974240368 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111894854206 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03283995717 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.