To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The author contends that big cities of society are main indicators of that society’s characteristics. This is a claim which is not always true. Among the countless reasons which give adherence to my perspective, I will delve to the most cogent ones in the following paragraphs.
The first striking factor which should cast doubt on the accuracy of this prompt is the influence of social media at the modernization of the major cities. Indeed, it is obvious that major and big cities have more easy access to different type of social media. This access leads to the interchange of the lots of information in a short period. The trend and modern living standard are one of these data which leads the major cities in the world get similar. Consequently, the major cities loss their main and native feature for the sake of modernization. On the other hand, the denizen in the small cities according to their privileged lifestyles, do not affect by this modernization and global standardization as the national at the big cities do. A lucid example which supports my argument is the tradition of celebrating the Nowruz_ New Year in Iran_ in the big city and small city of Iran. While in the small cities the family concern about whole details of this ceremony and try to follow all customs such as visiting the family members and giving gifts to each other, at the big cities most families considered it as the holiday and take trips.
Another crux factor which should be considered is the role of a major city as the immigrate state. Actually, the big cities for the sake of their facilities and job opportunities host lots of people from various small cities. This condition leads to the combination and merges of the various traditions since each immigrant carries his or her cultural values with him or herself during the migration. At this complex situation, the identification of the pure value from the others is an arduous task, it gets more difficult as you are a stranger. For instance, Tehran as the capital of Iran owns lots of advantages which gets thousands of immigrants from small cities pre-year. This fact leads to the missing and distortion of the main custom of Tehran. Thus, how a tourist could get familiar with this converted custom of Tehran?!
However, the abovementioned arguments should not be overgeneralized. The fact that the big cities possess the historical importance, and according to this significance the major and valuable construction could be found in these cities is undeniable. An example of this fact is Esfehan which is one of the major cities in Iran and during the past it was the capital of Iran for a long duration. Therefore, on that period a list of civilizations and constructions were done there. All of these buildings are the great benchmark of history of that city. If a tourist is really eager to visit the old buildings, this big city is a decent option for spending time. However, this fact is valid in the case that the stranger is willing to visit historical places. Otherwise, the big cities do not depict the major characteristics of nation.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned argument presents my perspective toward this disposition. While the big cities possess great historical buildings for visiting, the small cities present the indigenous values of each nation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | snowsss | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | snowsss | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | nikhil40507 | 33 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | satyam63 | 50 | view |
- tpo 28.1 70
- In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 70
- .The vice president for human resources at Climpson Industries sent the following recommendation to the company's president."In an effort to improve our employees' productivity, we should implement electronic monitoring of employees' I 59
- tpo 27 85
- Tpo23 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 482, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cities'' or 'city's'?
Suggestion: cities'; city's
...ld get similar. Consequently, the major cities loss their main and native feature for ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 655, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
... to their privileged lifestyles, do not affect by this modernization and global standardi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dered it as the holiday and take trips. Another crux factor which should be cons...
^^^^
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nsidered is the role of a major city as the immigrate state. Actually, the big cities for the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t the indigenous values of each nation.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, first, however, if, really, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2774.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 565.0 442.535393258 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90973451327 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87542086881 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86152820094 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465486725664 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 859.5 704.065955056 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.99550561798 260% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1277606418 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.740740741 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9259259259 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115496756757 0.243740707755 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0377987325103 0.0831039109588 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357127605887 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0721252111293 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323560016976 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 100.480337079 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.