As eBooks are available online these days, the value of paper based books has diminished drastically. Do you agree or disagree?
These days internet is burgeoning with books of all range starting from the classic novels to the latest technology books, all available as electronic copy of the original books. This phenomenon has sparked a heated debate among the people. While contested by many that these online books are demeaning the fame of the paper books, such issues are considered both constructive and positive by a significant number of individulas. I am inclined to believe that the eBooks are increasingly taking over the printed books and I will discuss this in this essay.
The number of people visiting library has come down drastically. As all the books required are accessible easily and quickly through the electronic media the readers can choose to access their favourite book from anywhere, and any time. For example, online books website www.readers.com can be used to search any book by any author and is available for them instantly. This might not be the case with real libraries as the printed copies in a library will be limited and might not be available. For such obvious reasons the need to use a physical book has plummeted among the people of all age group.
Within the realm of environment, computer based books have been playing a significant role. It is evident that plethora of trees are cut every single day to produce papers on which books are printed. An academic research undertaken by a prestigious university in recent times has concluded that with the introduction of eBooks the deforestation rate has reduced significantly. Hence it is required to encourage more on computer based reading than hardcopy books concerning the environment.
In conclusion, whereas, there are numerous arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the advantages of electronic books far outweigh any minor disadvatages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-18 | shankaraviji | 85 | view |
- Trying to save endangered species from extinction is a waste of valuable resources, do you agree or disagree? 11
- Governments should reduce their investments in arts, music, and painting. Do you agree or disagree? 55
- The traditional subjects are soon moving off since last few years in schools. Kindly provide the solutions and ideas to save such subjects. 61
- Student travel to study is overrated, we have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really required for higher studies? 80
- Should there be a variety of learning methodologies implemented within the school learning curriculum Or Discuss the types of teaching methods and their advantages and disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
These days internet is burgeoning with books of al...
^^^^
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'books'' or 'book's'?
Suggestion: books'; book's
...here, and any time. For example, online books website www.readers.com can be used to ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 378, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...station rate has reduced significantly. Hence it is required to encourage more on com...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, so, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16891891892 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87529177228 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577702702703 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3727529861 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.285714286 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07142857143 7.25397266985 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194404236946 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619022872064 0.0925447433944 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380256395788 0.071462118173 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104445589813 0.151781067708 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447818325394 0.0609392437508 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 12.6369458128 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.