The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The bar chart above illustrates the frequency of eating in fast food restaurants in the USA in the years 2003, 2006, and 2013.
Overall, in both 2003 and 2006, most people preferred to eat in fast food restaurants once a week, whereas in 2013, the majority ate fast food once or twice a week. Over the period given, the least number of people was the ones who went to fast food restaurants on a daily basis.
From 2003 to 2006, the percentage of Americans who ate at fast food restaurants every day and the ones who never ate decreased by 2% and 1%, respectively. The numbers remained stable until 2013. Opposite trends can be seen with the group who ate fast food only a few times a year. In 2003, the percentage was approximately 12%, before growing to 15% in 2006 and 2013.
In 2003, the majority of the US citizens, about 31%, ate in a fast food restaurant once a week. This number increased by 3% in 2006, then declined to 27% in 2013. Similar trends were seen with the group who ate in such facilities several times a week: 17%, 20%, and 16% in the years 2003, 2006, and 2013, respectively.
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 67
- The Diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. 84
- Some people say that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste? 73
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country. Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language.Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The maps below show recent changes in the town of Kimsville. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 16, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ars 2003, 2006, and 2013, respectively.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6157635468 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45376573735 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497536945813 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4035531393 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.3 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374185431396 0.215688989381 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165580099983 0.103423049105 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0934402686683 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272446443273 0.15604864568 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524811328607 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.