Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It has been popularly thought that governments should not fund art and culture as they bring no benefits for the population and the culture but also another mass of people hold an opposite view. In my opinion, art and culture should be considered as a major segment for supporting from the governments as they could benefit both the population and the culture in many ways.
On the one hand, art and culture not only can greatly contribute to the population economically but also can bring plenty of positive impacts on human health. For example, art and cultural museums are often listed as spotlights drawing a huge number of both foreign and local visitors. In addition, art and culture could be seen as special products for export. Take Korea as an example, the popularity of Korean music not only gives Korea an economic boost but also helps it to spread its tradition and culture all over the world. Secondly, a rising number of scientific proofs claims that art can strengthen and sharpen human brain. For example, in an experiment in 1970s, some students who are allowed to listen to the classical music for 10 minutes showed higher scores from a test than those did not. Furthermore, art is evidently proved that it can release stress and bring more positive feelings for people. It has been stated that people who are more accessible to the arts usually feel happier in their lives.
On the other hand, many people think otherwise that government funds should be allocated on other major segments such as healthcare and education as they give more direct influence on people's lives than art and culture. As a matter of fact, this is true. For instance, a good educational system would enable students to be more active, more creative, smarter, more confident and therefore, it would as well improve the work force and the employment market.
In conclusion, although government funds on critical segments such as healthcare and education are absolutely necessary but art and culture, in my view, also have a great number of direct benefits for both population and culture.
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave-energy machine and its location.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The chart bellow shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008. 73
- People are wasting a lot of food these days What causes it and what solutions are possible 59
- Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- 100 years ago people thought that human race was steadily making progress in all areas of life, nowadays there is less certainty that is so. In what areas do you think the most important progress has been made so far? In what areas more things need to be 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 665, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1970s'.
Suggestion: in the 1970s
...an brain. For example, in an experiment in 1970s, some students who are allowed to liste...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 144, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessary'.
Suggestion: necessary
...nt such as healthcare and education are absolutely necessary but art and culture, in my view, also h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, in my opinion, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96368715084 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59202375042 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511173184358 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.0124192777 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.928571429 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.4285714286 7.06120827912 204% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395728183216 0.244688304435 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128530979447 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105375666155 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255271991639 0.151304729494 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062814529418 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.