What is your opinion on whether the consumer should avoid over packed product or is this the responsibility of the manufacturer to avoid extra packaging of product? Share your light on this topic?
These days there is an ongoing debate between people about consumer should avoid over packed product or manufacturer should avoid. While it is possible to claim that packing is needed for every product to delivery safely, my view is that the manufacturer should avoid over package has advantages outweigh the disadvantages. In this essay I shall explain my point of view by analysing both sides of arguments.
There are several reasons why manufacturer should avoid over package. One of them is that is that over package incurs some cost so that it would increase selling price of the product. Over packaged products incur 40 percent of selling price. It can also be argued that unnesscary packaging leads to landfill. It should also be taken into the account that less packaged can be easily moveable and easy to consume it.
Those who argue for consumer should avoid over package product have different view and say that it can be actually a good thing. Firstly it is claimed that over packaged product ensures the safety measure of product. Then there are concerns about damage of the product by including less package. Manufacturer can't bear damage cost.
while there are strong arguments on both sides of case, my opinion is that the manufacturer should avoid over packaging. I would strongly recommend that manufacturer should avoid over packaging as much as possible to avoid landfill. It help to keep our environment clean.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-01 | VanithaE | 55 | view |
| 2017-09-14 | Fiona Joanna Cruz | 77 | view |
| 2017-09-14 | Fiona Joanna Cruz | 77 | view |
- In the past 100 years there have been many inventions such as antibiotics airplanes and computers. What are the greatest inventions of the 20th century among medicine, aero plane and computers, why? 72
- The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write but those who cannot learn unlearn and relearn Agree or disagree 78
- More information available online so library books are useless. Agree or disagree with statement? 77
- In education system, assessment through formal written examination still valid? 72
- Company's top level authorities should get their employees in decision making process. 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'is that'.
Suggestion: is that
... should avoid over package. One of them is that is that over package incurs some cost so that i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 310, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...by including less package. Manufacturer cant bear damage cost. while there are s...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...Manufacturer cant bear damage cost. while there are strong arguments on both side...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 237, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
... much as possible to avoid landfill. It help to keep our environment clean.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, firstly, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 20.9802955665 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.75862068966 17% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1203.0 1207.87684729 100% => OK
No of words: 238.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05462184874 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55280024063 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542016806723 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 382.5 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.4334319525 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.2 104.977214359 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8666666667 20.9669160288 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 7.25397266985 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405307842024 0.242375264174 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143366358974 0.0925447433944 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918690286968 0.071462118173 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265825945402 0.151781067708 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502130342597 0.0609392437508 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 12.6369458128 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.1260098522 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.32886699507 93% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 55.0591133005 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.