in twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than today.
Nowadays, cars numbers nearly the same number of people in some regions. The extensive demand to pass along distance to reach the work or the school imposed the people to buy cars. Some people think that in twenty years will be fewer cars in use than today, while others think that will be more cars to use. Personally, I think that fewer cars will be in the future.
First, the traffic is crowded because the number of cars is increasing and the streets are narrow with respect to the huge numbers of cars especially in the poor region, there is no space for more cars, so the people should find solutions. The problem here embedded in the time consumed every day while you stuck in the roads. In this situation the people will sell their cars and start to use public transportation for long distances or they will return to using motors and bicycles as in the past. my own experiences is a compelling example of this, my university is using cycles application to help pupils to move in the university instead of using their cars. I found that way has a fantastic effect on organizing the traffic.
Second, I think that oil and fuel will become more expensive than today because they are unsustainable resources, they will end in one day, this will make the fueling cost more than the people budget. Also, this resource pollute the air with their poisons smoke; therefore, the people will search for an alternative solution like public transportation or cycles. For example the poor countries like India and Pakistan using motor more than any region because it is cheaper, also in China many people go to their work on cycles because they want to keep the environment clean for the next generations.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that in twenty years there will be fewer cars in use, because of the fueling cost, the negative effect on the environment, and the traffic crowded in the streets. I suggest that governments should help people to overcome the cost problem and to make strict laws to decrease augment numbers of cars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | prakriti malla | 73 | view |
- Young people enjoy their life more than older people? do you agree or disagree? 70
- The altruism in animals and humans 78
- Our life is much easier than our parents life agree or disagree 70
- do you agree or disagree that students should take a history class whether their field is in history or not. 70
- 000 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that fewer cars will be in the future. First, the traffic is crowded because th...
^^^
Line 2, column 503, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: My
...ing motors and bicycles as in the past. my own experiences is a compelling example...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stic effect on organizing the traffic. Second, I think that oil and fuel will b...
^^^
Line 3, column 411, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xample the poor countries like India and Pakistan using motor more than any regio...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onment clean for the next generations. In conclusion, I strongly believe that i...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, second, so, therefore, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 356.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72471910112 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4607126363 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494382022472 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 519.3 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.1223653251 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.142857143 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.408830313695 0.236089414692 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149869743449 0.076458572812 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.193738485645 0.0737576698707 263% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272541558996 0.150856017488 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145497060235 0.0645574589148 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.