. Technological access to online music and the like should be free or paid. What do you think?
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge in the trend to see prodigies discussing the fact that the access to online music should be paid. Critics, however, claim that it should be free for every listener to avail the chance of enjoying technological advancements. In my opinion, later argument is more realistic and worth to believe. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the important features of this statement before deducing any conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriad of arguments discussing the fact that technological access to online music should be free of cost. Firstly, the most conspicuous stem from the fact that in this contemporary world mobile apps which include google, you tube and many other social media channels are providing free access to online music to every user. Therefore, when people pay heavy taxes on every every thing they are using publicly or privately, they are supposed to use this facility to enjoy free online music. As a prime example, one the most famous music app Ghana is available to every one who are using android or other smart gadgets in free of cost.
Another, pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that free online music is quiet beneficial for talented singers who are struggling in their career. Moreover, music provides peace of mind while travelling and releases stress to greater extent and would be an easy access to every listener when available free of cost.
To recapitulate, the foregoing discussion propounds that free online music access is the most suitable facility for every person to enjoy the music. Therefore, ideas that will bring benefits would be cordially welcomed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-19 | Shruti gupta radhika | 85 | view |
| 2019-06-27 | harry J | 82 | view |
| 2019-06-27 | Navneet dhillon | 55 | view |
| 2019-06-27 | jashan randhawa | 77 | view |
| 2019-04-24 | zjaved | 80 | view |
- Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work? 77
- Should library use digital gadgets to provide information on different topics? Pros & Cons 88
- Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport? 55
- Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 371, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...lieve. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the important features of this statement be...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 391, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: every
...erefore, when people pay heavy taxes on every every thing they are using publicly or priva...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ple pay heavy taxes on every every thing they are using publicly or privately, th...
^^
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... beneficial for talented singers who are struggling in their career. Moreover, mu...
^^
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'easy access'.
Suggestion: easy access
...s stress to greater extent and would be an easy access to every listener when available free o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 21, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...able free of cost. To recapitulate, the foregoing discussion propounds that free...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, moreover, so, therefore, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05839416058 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5714366056 2.71678728327 95% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554744525547 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2692804733 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.5 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337580926558 0.242375264174 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133949667475 0.0925447433944 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102259459228 0.071462118173 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216763263432 0.151781067708 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325768027257 0.0609392437508 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.