TPO 31 - Integrated Writing Task
According to the passage, three reasons are provided by critics to be as opposed to the idea that Sinosauropteryx was a feathered dinosaur. In contrast, the lecturer proposes that these reasons, indeed, are not convincing as what she mentioned in the lecture.
First of all, the critical viewpoint that fine lines are thought to be formed after the animals' death since they are buried in volcanic ash where it would easily get decomposed into fibers is presented. Nevertheless, the professor rejects it because other animals which were also buried within the same area are not seen to react the same. Their skins buried in the same condition are well-preserved. In this case, these lines are made likely to be feathers and not fibers.
Second, it is thought to be true that this dinosaurs were not feathered since scientists cannot tell with the autonomy what these structures are as a result of the presence of frills on most of the dinosaurs. Notwithstanding, the professor opposes that the absence of Beta-keratin, solely contained by feathers, rules out the possibility of this theory. Owing to the presence of this protein in feathers while nothing related found in frills, these colorful lines are definitely feathers rather than frills.
Third, Sinosauropteryx is not regarded as a feathered dinosaur since the feathers are commonly discovered to serve to regulate the internal temperature as well as to help fly when color lines are mostly situated on tails and backbones. Whereas, the professor holds a contradictory view that lines can be utilized as different function. For instance, the peacock has feathers in its tail displayed to attract a mate. That is to say, lines on Sinosauropteryx may also serve as the function of attracting mates.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-07 | Mohammadreza1991 | 83 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | M.S 2019 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-19 | HHH | 85 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | raniamekhaiel | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-02 | bijan54 | 76 | view |
- You have long been friends with someone. If they do something that you don’t like , should you still be friends with him or her？ 60
- TPO 48 Integrated Writing Task 70
- Your friends have the opportunity to choose either one of two types of majors (fields of study), which one of the following two majors do you think is a better choice, and why?1. A major that would allow him to finish years of study and get a degree soone 70
- TPO 46 - Integrated Writing Task 88
- 15. A primary (elementary) school is considering increasing the amount of time it spends educating its young students about technology (for example, computers). To do so, it would decrease the amount of time it spends educating the students about music an 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...ines are thought to be formed after the animals death since they are buried in volcanic...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... Second, it is thought to be true that this dinosaurs were not feathered since scie...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, third, well, whereas, while, as to, for instance, in contrast, as a result, as well as, first of all, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 10.4613686534 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 287.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14982578397 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94080370536 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567944250871 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8777757815 49.2860985944 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.692307692 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6153846154 7.06452816374 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371836055624 0.272083759551 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117439725118 0.0996497079465 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651205982687 0.0662205650399 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197859932414 0.162205337803 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404675774528 0.0443174109184 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.