Some pp think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
People hold differing views about that university should give students the free choices subjects based on their preference, while others argue that the curriculum should be required the science and technology subjects. The following essay will clarify two side of arguments and provide my stand.
People in favor of the first notion base their ground on the fact that the workload causing the immense pressure from deadline. To be more specific, student force to finish those projects or assignments which is overload for them after harsh day in class. For that reason, school should create opportunity for young people to choose which subject belonging their preferences. This will result not only reducing depress phenomenon, but also creating a comfortable environment for studying. Nevertheless, it can be undeniable that those subjects are necessary for the development of people brain. Because the well-ground education will help them understanding clearly about soft skills which are not less crucial, all of which contribute hugely to train intellectuals and highly skilled workers
However, those who hold an opposition views that student should be allowed the subject about science and technology. There is no denying that science and technology play significant role in the prosperity of country, and many companies as well as corporations sought after professional employees in this field. Thus, most of parents hope that their children can focusing on learning these subjects for their better future occupations. On the contrary, schools and parents should think about young person’s ability. For those who cannot afford to study in this field which is above their capacity. In this sense, it would be sensible to claim that the requirement on study not good for developing creative on youngster
All in all, although it might seem sensible for universities to focus only on the most useful subjects, I personally prefer the current system in which people have the right to study whatever they like.
- Some people believe that preserving natural environment is crucial, however, most make no effort to do so. Why do you think this is happening? What are some simple actions that could help the environment? 73
- In many countries, very few young people read newspapers or follow the news on TV. What do you think are the causes of this? What solutions can you suggest? 78
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year, 2016. 78
- Some pp think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views and 84
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007. 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 644, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to understand' or 'understand'.
Suggestion: to understand; understand
...he well-ground education will help them understanding clearly about soft skills which are not...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the parents') or simply say ''most parents''.
Suggestion: most of the parents; most parents
...essional employees in this field. Thus, most of parents hope that their children can focusing o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, well, while, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3880126183 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73931491292 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605678233438 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.9761452199 49.4020404114 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.384615385 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3846153846 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290022128559 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891063712725 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711492714031 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182498818683 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420185161491 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.