Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
There is no doubt, that the problem of the effective utilization is one of the most important spheres of life. On the one hand, there is an idea that this is the responsibility of the household only. On the other hand, is the opinion that it should be coordinated, regulated, and controlled by authorities. I strongly consider, that is a common problem both for citizens and country and should be supported as much personally and by the law.
Here I would argue with a couple of examples why I suggest so. First of all, there is no denying that the waste generated by an average family consisting of 3 members is definitely immense. There are meal remains, paper, glass, plastic, batteries usual garbage may consist of. Each of these components is able to hurt nature dramatically. For instance, only one AAA-size battery pollutes 20 square meters of the soil. The plastic bags will not disappear even in 1000 years. Glass or metal might be the reason for a fatal accident for many wild animals when they eat it unintentionally. Eventually, global warming could be speeded up due to the decomposing of food wastes under the sun, water, and wind. Hence, I believe that such a crucial task shouldn’t be driven by good will only. Some of the houses might refer to this problem very seriously but the rest might understate the problem. That’s why the government has to take the liability issuing the respective rules for all population dwelling in the country.
Secondly, the utilization of variable wastes is a very complex process. It’s not enough to dig it deeper. The administration would be ready to create necessary conditions for recycling, such as the building of the special manufactures, educating of the people why it’s so critical, or developing the law which helps to avoid misleading in the process. There is a lot of work should be done in this way. Recycling manufactures are very expensive. Despite that, every business person or company, producing anything, would be worried about keeping the environment pure.
Though the problem of recycling is complicated and quite expensive, every human or politician should think of it every day. Wishing to keep nature, I strongly agree with the statement that is the common pain for each one of us
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-22 | ndbro17 | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-22 | ndbro17 | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-27 | Hanachan123456789 | 78 | view |
| 2020-04-17 | Shraddanand | 73 | view |
| 2020-02-24 | saipriyanka | 73 | view |
- Some people feel that boarding schools (where students or pupils live at the school during the term) are an excellent option for children, while other people disagree for a number of reasons. Consider both sides of this debate and reach a conclusion. 61
- Some people feel that boarding schools (where students or pupils live at the school during the term) are an excellent option for children, while other people disagree for a number of reasons. Consider both sides of this debate and reach a conclusion. 73
- Everybody should donate a fixed amount of their income to support charity. How far do you share this viewpoint? 73
- Some students have rented the apartment next to yours. Their parties are upsetting you, your family and other tenants. 89
- Some people feel that boarding schools (where students or pupils live at the school during the term) are an excellent option for children, while other people disagree for a number of reasons. Consider both sides of this debate and reach a conclusion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 790, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...ldn't be driven by good will only. Some of the houses might refer to this problem very...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, as to, for instance, no doubt, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1897.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 383.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95300261097 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87782237562 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590078328982 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.289153961 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.4782608696 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.652173913 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52173913043 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119096330524 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0298355158073 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0275574322282 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0671607613003 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291825307225 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.