The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s
The given graphs illustrate the five major source of energy in the USA between 1980 and 1990, and it is measured in percentage of various type of energy sources. Overall, it can be seen that, the proportion of oil was at maximum possible amount both in 1980 and in 1990, while hydroelectric power stayed at the same rate exactly and nuclear power encounter with dramatic rise.
First of all, the enrollment of natural gas change at least possible amount. Thus, it was decreased from 26% to 25% in 1980 and in 1990. By contrast, nuclear power doubled its percentage over the ten years and it was just one in ten in 1990.
Moreover, coal sources was 22% in 1980, and increased at over the one in four at the end of given time period. In opposite of coal sources, the rate of oil resource was 42% and diminished at 33% in the next decade.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-24 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-20 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 70 | view |
| 2022-10-14 | Hanabi | 67 | view |
| 2021-06-11 | bachduong123 | 11 | view |
| 2021-04-14 | Ngọc Ánh123 | view |
- Children's education is expensive. In some countries, the government pays some some or all costs. Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages 73
- Some people think that printed books are not necessary in the digital era because writing can be stored electronically. Others think printed books still play an important role. Discuss both view and give your own opinion. 61
- In many countries today, both men and women need work full time. Therefore, some proper think men and women should share household tasks equally. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 56
- some people believe that computers and the internet carry more weight than traditional education in children's study. Some others believe that traditional schooling and teachers are still essential and more effective. Discuss both viewpoints and give 73
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... it is measured in percentage of various type of energy sources. Overall, it can ...
^^
Line 2, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the ten years and it was just one in ten in 1990. Moreover, coal sources was 22...
^^
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in ten in 1990. Moreover, coal sources was 22% in 1980, and increased at over t...
^^
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l resource was 42% and diminished at 33% in the next decade.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, so, thus, while, at least, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 686.0 965.302439024 71% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.45454545455 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.381479674 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577922077922 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 205.2 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0006247357 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0790705013373 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405309361226 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835786233411 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.053240349076 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566763184663 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.53 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.