The producers of the forthcoming movie 3003 will be most likely to maximize their profits if they are willing to pay Robin Good several million dollars to star in it - even though that amount is far more than any other person involved in the movie will make. After all, Robin has in the past been paid a similar amount to work in several films that were very financially successful.
The argument claims that casting Robin Good will itself be sufficient for the movie 3003 to perform well. In this argument the author makes an unfounded assumption of a causal relationship between a specific type of actor and the movie's performance in the theatres. Due to lack of key considerations and evidence to further bolster the claim made by author, this argument is unconvincing and has several flaws.
Firstly, there are multiple people involved in a good film production, inlcuding a production team, directors, actors, support staff, whose combined efforts make a movie perform good on the screen. For example, for a particular film production, the actors and support staff hired are the best in industry, but the producers and directors are of less credibility, such a scenario makes the movie a little less appealing than what could be if all the hired personalls are best in there class.
Secondly, Relying just on the actors is a vague and unsupported claim. If an actor has performed decently well in his or her past movies, it is not a guarantee that he or she will do the same this time and a sense of uncertainity should always be factored in. Spending million of dollars to star in the actor of choice could turn into a nightmare for the producers if the actor is unable to uphold to his or her promises due to personals or natural reasons such as accidents, mishaps etc.at the end of the day it is the directors and producers who fetch out the acting out of the actor and there are instances where low budget actors starred in some movies and those movies performed extremely well in theatres.
The author could have added certain examples from real life events where such technique of just starring an expensive actor has worked in the past, to bolster his claim. This argument lacks support to the causality on which this claim is based, which is starring expensive actor is directly related to movies performance with a positive correlation. Support for this causality, if present, would have strengthen our beliefs in the argument further.
In conclusion, the argument is weak and dependent on oversimplieifed and un-supported assumptions. Vaarious new dat points and relevant fators need to be explored in order to justify this claim made from the magazine's author.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-04 | hattiengaines | 59 | view |
| 2020-05-19 | DC123123 | 61 | view |
| 2020-04-02 | DIRaGoIN | 79 | view |
| 2019-07-20 | nouri96 | 89 | view |
| 2019-06-06 | vipul.sahni | 72 | view |
- The following appeared in a report presented for discussion at a meeting of the directors of a company that manufactures parts for heavy machinery.“The falling revenues that the company is experiencing coincide with delays in manufacturing. These delays 41
- "In general, people are not as concerned as they were a decade ago about regulating their intake of red meat and fatty cheeses. Walk into Heart's Delight, a store that started selling organic fruits and vegetables and whole-grain flours in the 1 69
- The following appeared as part of an article on government funding of environmental regulatory agencies.“When scientists finally learn how to create large amounts of copper from other chemical elements, the regulation of copper mining will become unnece 66
- The following appeared as part of an editorial in an industry newsletter.“While trucking companies that deliver goods pay only a portion of highway maintenance costs and no property tax on the highways they use, railways spend billions per year maintain 75
- The following appeared as part of an article in a trade publication.“Stronger laws are needed to protect new kinds of home-security systems from being copied and sold by imitators. With such protection, manufacturers will naturally invest in the develop 89
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: For example, for a particular film production, the actors and support staff hired are the best in industry, but the producers and directors are of less credibility, such a scenario makes the movie a little less appealing than what could be if all the hired personalls are best in there class.
Description: The fragment in there class is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace there with adjective
Sentence: If an actor has performed decently well in his or her past movies, it is not a guarantee that he or she will do the same this time and a sense of uncertainity should always be factored in.
Description: The word in is not usually used as an adverb, particle
Suggestion: Refer to in
Sentence: Spending million of dollars to star in the actor of choice could turn into a nightmare for the producers if the actor is unable to uphold to his or her promises due to personals or natural reasons such as accidents, mishaps etc.at the end of the day it is the directors and producers who fetch out the acting out of the actor and there are instances where low budget actors starred in some movies and those movies performed extremely well in theatres.
Description: A determiner, possessive is not usually followed by a conjunction, coordinating
Suggestion: Refer to his and or
Sentence: This argument lacks support to the causality on which this claim is based, which is starring expensive actor is directly related to movies performance with a positive correlation.
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, singular, common
Suggestion: Refer to movies and performance
Sentence: Firstly, there are multiple people involved in a good film production, inlcuding a production team, directors, actors, support staff, whose combined efforts make a movie perform good on the screen.
Error: inlcuding Suggestion: including
Sentence: For example, for a particular film production, the actors and support staff hired are the best in industry, but the producers and directors are of less credibility, such a scenario makes the movie a little less appealing than what could be if all the hired personalls are best in there class.
Error: personalls Suggestion: personally
Sentence: If an actor has performed decently well in his or her past movies, it is not a guarantee that he or she will do the same this time and a sense of uncertainity should always be factored in.
Error: uncertainity Suggestion: uncertainty
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 388 350
No. of Characters: 1871 1500
No. of Different Words: 199 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.438 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.822 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.681 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 132 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 102 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 73 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 45 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 29.846 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 18.212 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.615 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.337 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.642 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.118 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 231, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'movies'' or 'movie's'?
Suggestion: movies'; movie's
...etween a specific type of actor and the movies performance in the theatres. Due to lac...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
... should always be factored in. Spending million of dollars to star in the actor of choi...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 402, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'strengthened'.
Suggestion: strengthened
... this causality, if present, would have strengthen our beliefs in the argument further. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.6327345309 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 11.1786427146 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 28.8173652695 73% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 55.5748502994 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1917.0 2260.96107784 85% => OK
No of words: 388.0 441.139720559 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94072164948 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75507025417 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 204.123752495 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523195876289 0.468620217663 112% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 705.55239521 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.8473053892 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.8626795945 57.8364921388 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.461538462 119.503703932 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8461538462 23.324526521 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 5.70786347227 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156735656168 0.218282227539 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562939842054 0.0743258471296 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636427544205 0.0701772020484 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0841069965751 0.128457276422 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04912760315 0.0628817314937 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 14.3799401198 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 48.3550499002 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.197005988 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.5979740519 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.32208582834 109% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 98.500998004 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.1389221557 122% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.